starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Circuits View not working with custom fields #11270

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:42:43 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:42:43 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @tobikris on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.3.2

Python Version

3.12

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Add Custom Field with name provider_id for Object Type "Circuit", leave settings on default.
  2. Open the list of circuits.

Expected Behavior

The circuits should be shown.

Observed Behavior

<class 'ValueError'>

'provider_id' does not resolve to an item that supports prefetching - this is an invalid parameter to prefetch_related().

Python version: 3.12.9
NetBox version: 4.3.2
Plugins: 
  netbox_demo: 0.5.0
Originally created by @tobikris on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.3.2 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Add Custom Field with name `provider_id` for Object Type "Circuit", leave settings on default. 2. Open the list of circuits. ### Expected Behavior The circuits should be shown. ### Observed Behavior ``` <class 'ValueError'> 'provider_id' does not resolve to an item that supports prefetching - this is an invalid parameter to prefetch_related(). Python version: 3.12.9 NetBox version: 4.3.2 Plugins: netbox_demo: 0.5.0 ```
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedseverity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:42:43 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:42:43 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:42:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025):

This seems to stem from a collision with the built-in field provider_id in the table somewhere. Renaming the custom field to e.g. provider_id2 resolves the problem.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025): This seems to stem from a collision with the built-in field `provider_id` in the table somewhere. Renaming the custom field to e.g. `provider_id2` resolves the problem.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:42:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tobikris commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025):

Oh, wow. That explains why we did not find any other issue - no report and no other affected object type. Thanks for the quick fix and workaround!

@tobikris commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2025): Oh, wow. That explains why we did not find any other issue - no report and no other affected object type. Thanks for the quick fix and workaround!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label severity: low status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11270
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?