starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

port type E2000 APC missing #11169

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:41:15 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:15 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @EmmanuelFMI on GitHub (May 13, 2025).

NetBox version

v4.2.6

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Port types Fiber - E2000 APC (comment: LWL 48x 9/125μm Singlemode) missing on netbox

Use case

As a single source of truth, Netbox should make it possible to create E2000 port type without having to create custom fields.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @EmmanuelFMI on GitHub (May 13, 2025). ### NetBox version v4.2.6 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality Port types Fiber - E2000 APC (comment: LWL 48x 9/125μm Singlemode) missing on netbox ### Use case As a single source of truth, Netbox should make it possible to create E2000 port type without having to create custom fields. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 21:41:15 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:41:15 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:16 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pheus commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025):

I can confirm that the E2000 APC port type is currently missing from the available options in NetBox, and adding it would be a valuable enhancement.

However, I’d like to clarify that LC-OM4 doesn't represent a distinct port type. LC refers to the connector type, while OM4 specifies the fiber classification (multimode, 50/125µm). In NetBox, this combination can already be modeled using the existing LC port type along with the appropriate cable type (e.g., OM4). So in this case, no new port type is needed.

I’d suggest updating the title and content of this feature request to focus solely on the missing E2000 APC port type.

@pheus commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025): I can confirm that the **E2000 APC** port type is currently missing from the available options in NetBox, and adding it would be a valuable enhancement. However, I’d like to clarify that **LC-OM4** doesn't represent a distinct port type. **LC** refers to the connector type, while **OM4** specifies the fiber classification (multimode, 50/125µm). In NetBox, this combination can already be modeled using the existing **LC port type** along with the appropriate **cable type** (e.g., OM4). So in this case, no new port type is needed. I’d suggest updating the **title and content** of this feature request to focus solely on the missing **E2000 APC** port type.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:16 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025):

Agree with @pheus here, particularly about how to model LC-OM4 connections.

With regard to the E2000 connector type, though, we already have that option (and more) available as the LSH/APC port type. E2000 is trademarked by Diamond and appears to be an implementation of LSH, per the TIA 604-16 spec.

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025): Agree with @pheus here, particularly about how to model LC-OM4 connections. With regard to the E2000 connector type, though, we already have that option (and more) available as the `LSH/APC` port type. E2000 is trademarked by Diamond and appears to be an implementation of LSH, per the TIA 604-16 spec.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11169
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?