starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add color backgrounds for virtual circuit types #11158

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @aq5747 on GitHub (May 10, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @aq5747 on GitHub.

NetBox version

v4.2.9

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

In v4.2.9, color backgrounds were added to circuit types in table views (#17151). However, this was not added to virtual circuit types even though those support colors as well.

This is most noticeable when viewing a provider network that has both circuits and virtual circuits assigned to it.

Image

Use case

This adds visual consistency when viewing both circuits and virtual circuits.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @aq5747 on GitHub (May 10, 2025). Originally assigned to: @aq5747 on GitHub. ### NetBox version v4.2.9 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality In v4.2.9, color backgrounds were added to circuit types in table views (#17151). However, this was not added to virtual circuit types even though those support colors as well. This is most noticeable when viewing a provider network that has both circuits and virtual circuits assigned to it. ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f626806d-cbd9-4b2c-81f6-6e44d784958a) ### Use case This adds visual consistency when viewing both circuits and virtual circuits. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurecomplexity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@aq5747 commented on GitHub (May 10, 2025):

I'd like to contribute this if possible.

@aq5747 commented on GitHub (May 10, 2025): I'd like to contribute this if possible.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:41:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025):

It's all yours, @aq5747 !

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (May 13, 2025): It's all yours, @aq5747 !
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11158
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?