starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

module_bay_count=0 for device created through custom script/nbshell #11145

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:40:56 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:40:56 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Tina8S on GitHub (May 8, 2025).

Deployment Type

NetBox Cloud

NetBox Version

v4.2.3

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

When creating a device based on a device template with module bays the device shows up as having module_bay_count=0 within the script (At this point the GUI shows module bay tab, though). After saving the device (device.save()) within the script (i.e. after adding primary ipv4 address) the module_bay_count is saved as "0" and even the GUI does no longer show the tab for the module bays. A reverse search for module bays belonging to the device still lists the module bays, though.

Code to reproduce via nbshell:

>>> my_dev_type
<DeviceType: C9410R>
>>> my_dev_type.module_bay_template_count
10
>>> my_test_device = Device.objects.create(name="testdevice", device_type=my_dev_type, role=my_role, site=my_site, serial="wersdf213", status=my_status, comments="Test Test Test")
>>> my_test_device.module_bay_count
0
>>> ModuleBay.objects.filter(device=my_test_device)
<TreeQuerySet [<ModuleBay: Slot 1>, <ModuleBay: Slot 2>, <ModuleBay: Slot 3>, <ModuleBay: Slot 4>, <ModuleBay: Slot 5>, <ModuleBay: Slot 6>, <ModuleBay: Slot 7>, <ModuleBay: Slot 8>, <ModuleBay: Slot 9>, <ModuleBay: Slot 10>]>

Expected Behavior

The module_bay_count should be set to the number of module bays that belong to the device

Observed Behavior

module_bay_count is set to 0 instead and (after saving device within script) no tab for module bays shows up in GUI

Originally created by @Tina8S on GitHub (May 8, 2025). ### Deployment Type NetBox Cloud ### NetBox Version v4.2.3 ### Python Version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce When creating a device based on a device template with module bays the device shows up as having module_bay_count=0 within the script (At this point the GUI shows module bay tab, though). After saving the device (device.save()) within the script (i.e. after adding primary ipv4 address) the module_bay_count is saved as "0" and even the GUI does no longer show the tab for the module bays. A reverse search for module bays belonging to the device still lists the module bays, though. Code to reproduce via nbshell: ``` >>> my_dev_type <DeviceType: C9410R> >>> my_dev_type.module_bay_template_count 10 >>> my_test_device = Device.objects.create(name="testdevice", device_type=my_dev_type, role=my_role, site=my_site, serial="wersdf213", status=my_status, comments="Test Test Test") >>> my_test_device.module_bay_count 0 >>> ModuleBay.objects.filter(device=my_test_device) <TreeQuerySet [<ModuleBay: Slot 1>, <ModuleBay: Slot 2>, <ModuleBay: Slot 3>, <ModuleBay: Slot 4>, <ModuleBay: Slot 5>, <ModuleBay: Slot 6>, <ModuleBay: Slot 7>, <ModuleBay: Slot 8>, <ModuleBay: Slot 9>, <ModuleBay: Slot 10>]> ``` ### Expected Behavior The module_bay_count should be set to the number of module bays that belong to the device ### Observed Behavior module_bay_count is set to 0 instead and (after saving device within script) no tab for module bays shows up in GUI
adam added the netbox label 2025-12-29 21:40:56 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:40:56 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:40:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@arthanson commented on GitHub (May 8, 2025):

@Tina8S I'm converting this to a discussion, it sounds like you are having a coding issue with the script and it would get more feedback as a discussion.

@arthanson commented on GitHub (May 8, 2025): @Tina8S I'm converting this to a discussion, it sounds like you are having a coding issue with the script and it would get more feedback as a discussion.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label netbox
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11145
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?