starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Cable trace results in path split #11016

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:39:10 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:39:10 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Poletuch on GitHub (Apr 11, 2025).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.2.6, v3.7.5

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

First of all, if this request has already been addressed, I apologize for the duplicity.

Build the path from one device to another using:
1. Cable from the interface (switch for example) to the 2xFront port (ODF for example)
2. Splice from the Rear port using for example 24 positions to the second ODF (could be through Circuit and 2x cables on both ends of the circuit)
3. Cable from the second ODF from the 2xFront ports to the third ODF as the 2xRear ports
4. Cable from the third ODF from the 2xFront ports to the interface of the device (switch for example)

Expected Behavior

Cable trace starting from both sides should show completed path.

Observed Behavior

This results in path-split when looking to the Cable trace from the first (in the list above) switch point of view.
Cable trace from the second device view (from the oposite side) is bult correctly.

I can share screenshots later if needed, but I prefer private channel.

Originally created by @Poletuch on GitHub (Apr 11, 2025). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.2.6, v3.7.5 ### Python Version 3.11 ### Steps to Reproduce First of all, if this request has already been addressed, I apologize for the duplicity. Build the path from one device to another using: 1. Cable from the interface (switch for example) to the 2xFront port (ODF for example) 2. Splice from the Rear port using for example 24 positions to the second ODF (could be through Circuit and 2x cables on both ends of the circuit) 3. Cable from the second ODF from the 2xFront ports to the third ODF as the 2xRear ports 4. Cable from the third ODF from the 2xFront ports to the interface of the device (switch for example) ### Expected Behavior Cable trace starting from both sides should show completed path. ### Observed Behavior This results in path-split when looking to the Cable trace from the first (in the list above) switch point of view. Cable trace from the second device view (from the oposite side) is bult correctly. I can share screenshots later if needed, but I prefer private channel.
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 21:39:10 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:39:10 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:39:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2025):

I think this is likely a duplicate of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/16832.

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Apr 11, 2025): I think this is likely a duplicate of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/16832.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#11016
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?