Virtual chassis: members type #10890

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:37:19 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @alex-gutzeit on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025).

NetBox version

v4.2.2

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

There is a reason to add another type of member devices: virtual machines. There are a lot of virtual gateways, which could be clusterising in one virtual chassis

Use case

There are two hypervisors, there are two virtual gateways on these hypervisors, both of them are one virtual chassis.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @alex-gutzeit on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025). ### NetBox version v4.2.2 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality There is a reason to add another type of member devices: virtual machines. There are a lot of virtual gateways, which could be clusterising in one virtual chassis ### Use case There are two hypervisors, there are two virtual gateways on these hypervisors, both of them are one virtual chassis. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurepending closurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 21:37:19 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:37:20 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2025):

Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our contributing guide, a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2025): Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2025):

This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2025): This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2025):

This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 4, 2025): This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10890