starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

IP Address Bulk Create misses DNS name field #10864

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:36:55 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:36:55 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jhofmueller on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.2.5

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Open the widget to add an IP Address
  2. Click on "Bulk Create"

Expected Behavior

I expect a field "DNS name pattern" similar to "Address pattern".

Observed Behavior

There is no possibility to specify a DNS name pattern for bulk creation of addresses.

Originally created by @jhofmueller on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.2.5 ### Python Version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Open the widget to add an IP Address 2. Click on "Bulk Create" ### Expected Behavior I expect a field "DNS name pattern" similar to "Address pattern". ### Observed Behavior There is no possibility to specify a DNS name pattern for bulk creation of addresses.
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 21:36:55 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:36:56 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:36:56 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jhofmueller commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025):

I case this is not a bug I suggest changing this to a feature request 😎

@jhofmueller commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025): I case this is not a bug I suggest changing this to a feature request 😎
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:36:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025):

Thank you for opening an issue, @jhofmueller . As you alluded to, there exists a grey area between bug and enhancement, and it seems your issue falls into that zone. We promise to give your request fair consideration, but we need to ask a favor. To help us understand your request in detail, we ask you to recreate this issue as a feature request. We value your time and hate that this will create duplicate work for you, but GitHub currently offers no way to carry over the fields included in the bug report template to the feature request one. Thanks for understanding, and for your interest in helping improve NetBox.

@jnovinger commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025): Thank you for opening an issue, @jhofmueller . As you alluded to, there exists a grey area between bug and enhancement, and it seems your issue falls into that zone. We promise to give your request fair consideration, but we need to ask a favor. To help us understand your request in detail, we ask you to recreate this issue as a [feature request](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/new?template=feature_request.yaml). We value your time and hate that this will create duplicate work for you, but GitHub currently offers no way to carry over the fields included in the bug report template to the feature request one. Thanks for understanding, and for your interest in helping improve NetBox.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10864
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?