starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

802.1ad (AKA: QinQ, Service Tag) #1083

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:28:38 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:28:38 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @cre8rnz on GitHub (Jul 9, 2017).

Any chance we can reopen this? 802.1ad is being used more and more ..
We have to use VRFs for IPs and VLAN Groups to do this currently and it makes things a tad messy for us.
Not sure how complex it would be to effectively duplicate the VLAN functions, Call it ServiceTAG, make it all masters for vlans and add a new column for ServiceTAG under vlans?

Enable creation of QinQ VLANs #116l
VLAN “Service Identifier” field (VXLAN or ISID) #777l

Originally created by @cre8rnz on GitHub (Jul 9, 2017). Any chance we can reopen this? 802.1ad is being used more and more .. We have to use VRFs for IPs and VLAN Groups to do this currently and it makes things a tad messy for us. Not sure how complex it would be to effectively duplicate the VLAN functions, Call it ServiceTAG, make it all masters for vlans and add a new column for ServiceTAG under vlans? [Enable creation of QinQ VLANs #116l](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/116) [VLAN “Service Identifier” field (VXLAN or ISID) #777l](https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/777)
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 16:28:38 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:28:38 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:28:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2017):

Duplicate of #116. Please avoid opening new issues for topics which have already been addressed.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2017): Duplicate of #116. Please avoid opening new issues for topics which have already been addressed.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:28:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2017):

Hi Jeremy,

Not sure why you have deleted my previous comment, however...
I had a college ask me what was the outcome of this so thought I would ask again.
Is there anyway we can re-open an issue (for discussion among yourself and other users) that has been addressed without it being closed before discussion?

There was a good few people interested in this in the beginning (Which I have linked to in my original post). And I imagine with all of the active users now there may be more interest ?

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2017): Hi Jeremy, Not sure why you have deleted my previous comment, however... I had a college ask me what was the outcome of this so thought I would ask again. Is there anyway we can re-open an issue (for discussion among yourself and other users) that has been addressed without it being closed before discussion? There was a good few people interested in this in the beginning (Which I have linked to in my original post). And I imagine with all of the active users now there may be more interest ?
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:28:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2019):

Hey Guys,
Have had 2 more people say +1 for reopening on the following; https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/116
Those comments were deleted and the issue has been closed.
Seems people are after this as an option.

Any plans to add this at any stage?

Thanks

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2019): Hey Guys, Have had 2 more people say +1 for reopening on the following; https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/116 Those comments were deleted and the issue has been closed. Seems people are after this as an option. Any plans to add this at any stage? Thanks
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:28:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2019):

FYI Also have https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/1725 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/1800 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/2800 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/777 related to this.

Thanks

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2019): FYI Also have https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/1725 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/1800 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/2800 and https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/777 related to this. Thanks
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: duplicate
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#1083
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?