starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

New Power Socket Types Combo C13/15 and Combo C13/15/19 #10707

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:35:00 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:00 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @bkrauthamerOz on GitHub (Jan 28, 2025).

NetBox version

Netbox Cloud

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

New power socket types. Panduit is now producing PDUs with 2 types of combination sockets. C13/C15 and C13/C15/C19. Please see product model sheet here. https://www.panduit.com/content/dam/panduit/en/products/media/9/19/919/6919/111456919.pdf

I do not know if there is an IEC standard that goes with these.

Use case

Attempting to create a new device type for a Panduit P48G33G PDU.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @bkrauthamerOz on GitHub (Jan 28, 2025). ### NetBox version Netbox Cloud ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality New power socket types. Panduit is now producing PDUs with 2 types of combination sockets. C13/C15 and C13/C15/C19. Please see product model sheet here. https://www.panduit.com/content/dam/panduit/en/products/media/9/19/919/6919/111456919.pdf I do not know if there is an IEC standard that goes with these. ### Use case Attempting to create a new device type for a Panduit P48G33G PDU. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:35:00 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ZPrimed commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025):

The "C13/C15 combo" appears to just be a C15. I don't see any reason that would require a different connector type. Basically, a C15 is already a "combo C13/15" by definition. Wikipedia explains this a little better.

That weird 13/15/19 is something I've never seen before though, and would probably warrant a new addition...

@ZPrimed commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2025): The "C13/C15 combo" appears to just be a C15. I don't see any reason that would require a different connector type. Basically, a C15 is already a "combo C13/15" by definition. [Wikipedia explains this a little better](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60320#C15/C16_coupler). That weird 13/15/19 is something I've never seen before though, and would probably warrant a new addition...
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@JohTveit commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025):

Hi,
i am looking for the same type of port.
The new APC PDUs come with 4 in 1 port. C13, C15, C19 and C21 in the same port.
https://www.se.com/no/no/product/APDU10350SW/apc-netshelter-rack-pdu-advanced-switched-3phase-22-1kw-400v-32a-or-17-3kw-415v-30a-48-outlets-iec309/
Could we do a C21/C15 combo port?

@JohTveit commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025): Hi, i am looking for the same type of port. The new APC PDUs come with 4 in 1 port. C13, C15, C19 and C21 in the same port. https://www.se.com/no/no/product/APDU10350SW/apc-netshelter-rack-pdu-advanced-switched-3phase-22-1kw-400v-32a-or-17-3kw-415v-30a-48-outlets-iec309/ Could we do a C21/C15 combo port?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@trrunde commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2025):

New eaton epdu g4 pdu uses a plug called C39 which is a combo C13/19.

https://www.eaton.com/no/no-no/skuPage.EVMAF332A.html

@trrunde commented on GitHub (Feb 11, 2025): New eaton epdu g4 pdu uses a plug called C39 which is a combo C13/19. https://www.eaton.com/no/no-no/skuPage.EVMAF332A.html
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025):

Let's come to a consensus on the canonical list of these connector types so we know exactly what we're adding.

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Feb 27, 2025): Let's come to a consensus on the canonical list of these connector types so we know exactly what we're adding.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2025):

This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 7, 2025): This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:35:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025):

This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025): This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low pending closure status: revisions needed type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10707
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?