starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

enabling multi-worker parallel task processing #10663

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @dianbofa on GitHub (Jan 17, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @dianbofa on GitHub.

NetBox version

v4.0.8

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Triage priority

I volunteer to perform this work (if approved)

Proposed functionality

Add a parameter queue_name to the enqueue method of the netbox.core.models.Job class to allow specifying the rq_queue_name for enabling multi-worker parallel task processing.

Use case

The implementation of parallel task processing for rqworker will significantly enhance task handling efficiency.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @dianbofa on GitHub (Jan 17, 2025). Originally assigned to: @dianbofa on GitHub. ### NetBox version v4.0.8 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Triage priority I volunteer to perform this work (if approved) ### Proposed functionality Add a parameter queue_name to the enqueue method of the netbox.core.models.Job class to allow specifying the rq_queue_name for enabling multi-worker parallel task processing. ### Use case The implementation of parallel task processing for rqworker will significantly enhance task handling efficiency. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurecomplexity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2025):

@dianbofa Are you still interested in working on this?

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Feb 20, 2025): @dianbofa Are you still interested in working on this?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:34:27 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025):

@jeremystretch I'd like to take this.

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025): @jeremystretch I'd like to take this.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10663
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?