mirror of
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git
synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Adding objects in API with "custom_fields" does not work. #1057
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:28:23 +01:00 by adam
·
8 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
main
update-changelog-comments-docs
feature-removal-issue-type
20911-dropdown
20239-plugin-menu-classes-mutable-state
21097-graphql-id-lookups
feature
fix_module_substitution
20923-dcim-templates
20044-elevation-stuck-lightmode
feature-ip-prefix-link
v4.5-beta1-release
20068-import-moduletype-attrs
20766-fix-german-translation-code-literals
20378-del-script
7604-filter-modifiers-v3
circuit-swap
12318-case-insensitive-uniqueness
20637-improve-device-q-filter
20660-script-load
19724-graphql
20614-update-ruff
14884-script
02496-max-page
19720-macaddress-interface-generic-relation
19408-circuit-terminations-export-templates
20203-openapi-check
fix-19669-api-image-download
7604-filter-modifiers
19275-fixes-interface-bulk-edit
fix-17794-get_field_value_return_list
11507-show-aggregate-and-rir-on-api
9583-add_column_specific_search_field_to_tables
v4.5.0
v4.4.10
v4.4.9
v4.5.0-beta1
v4.4.8
v4.4.7
v4.4.6
v4.4.5
v4.4.4
v4.4.3
v4.4.2
v4.4.1
v4.4.0
v4.3.7
v4.4.0-beta1
v4.3.6
v4.3.5
v4.3.4
v4.3.3
v4.3.2
v4.3.1
v4.3.0
v4.2.9
v4.3.0-beta2
v4.2.8
v4.3.0-beta1
v4.2.7
v4.2.6
v4.2.5
v4.2.4
v4.2.3
v4.2.2
v4.2.1
v4.2.0
v4.1.11
v4.1.10
v4.1.9
v4.1.8
v4.2-beta1
v4.1.7
v4.1.6
v4.1.5
v4.1.4
v4.1.3
v4.1.2
v4.1.1
v4.1.0
v4.0.11
v4.0.10
v4.0.9
v4.1-beta1
v4.0.8
v4.0.7
v4.0.6
v4.0.5
v4.0.3
v4.0.2
v4.0.1
v4.0.0
v3.7.8
v3.7.7
v4.0-beta2
v3.7.6
v3.7.5
v4.0-beta1
v3.7.4
v3.7.3
v3.7.2
v3.7.1
v3.7.0
v3.6.9
v3.6.8
v3.6.7
v3.7-beta1
v3.6.6
v3.6.5
v3.6.4
v3.6.3
v3.6.2
v3.6.1
v3.6.0
v3.5.9
v3.6-beta2
v3.5.8
v3.6-beta1
v3.5.7
v3.5.6
v3.5.5
v3.5.4
v3.5.3
v3.5.2
v3.5.1
v3.5.0
v3.4.10
v3.4.9
v3.5-beta2
v3.4.8
v3.5-beta1
v3.4.7
v3.4.6
v3.4.5
v3.4.4
v3.4.3
v3.4.2
v3.4.1
v3.4.0
v3.3.10
v3.3.9
v3.4-beta1
v3.3.8
v3.3.7
v3.3.6
v3.3.5
v3.3.4
v3.3.3
v3.3.2
v3.3.1
v3.3.0
v3.2.9
v3.2.8
v3.3-beta2
v3.2.7
v3.3-beta1
v3.2.6
v3.2.5
v3.2.4
v3.2.3
v3.2.2
v3.2.1
v3.2.0
v3.1.11
v3.1.10
v3.2-beta2
v3.1.9
v3.2-beta1
v3.1.8
v3.1.7
v3.1.6
v3.1.5
v3.1.4
v3.1.3
v3.1.2
v3.1.1
v3.1.0
v3.0.12
v3.0.11
v3.0.10
v3.1-beta1
v3.0.9
v3.0.8
v3.0.7
v3.0.6
v3.0.5
v3.0.4
v3.0.3
v3.0.2
v3.0.1
v3.0.0
v2.11.12
v3.0-beta2
v2.11.11
v2.11.10
v3.0-beta1
v2.11.9
v2.11.8
v2.11.7
v2.11.6
v2.11.5
v2.11.4
v2.11.3
v2.11.2
v2.11.1
v2.11.0
v2.10.10
v2.10.9
v2.11-beta1
v2.10.8
v2.10.7
v2.10.6
v2.10.5
v2.10.4
v2.10.3
v2.10.2
v2.10.1
v2.10.0
v2.9.11
v2.10-beta2
v2.9.10
v2.10-beta1
v2.9.9
v2.9.8
v2.9.7
v2.9.6
v2.9.5
v2.9.4
v2.9.3
v2.9.2
v2.9.1
v2.9.0
v2.9-beta2
v2.8.9
v2.9-beta1
v2.8.8
v2.8.7
v2.8.6
v2.8.5
v2.8.4
v2.8.3
v2.8.2
v2.8.1
v2.8.0
v2.7.12
v2.7.11
v2.7.10
v2.7.9
v2.7.8
v2.7.7
v2.7.6
v2.7.5
v2.7.4
v2.7.3
v2.7.2
v2.7.1
v2.7.0
v2.6.12
v2.6.11
v2.6.10
v2.6.9
v2.7-beta1
Solcon-2020-01-06
v2.6.8
v2.6.7
v2.6.6
v2.6.5
v2.6.4
v2.6.3
v2.6.2
v2.6.1
v2.6.0
v2.5.13
v2.5.12
v2.6-beta1
v2.5.11
v2.5.10
v2.5.9
v2.5.8
v2.5.7
v2.5.6
v2.5.5
v2.5.4
v2.5.3
v2.5.2
v2.5.1
v2.5.0
v2.4.9
v2.5-beta2
v2.4.8
v2.5-beta1
v2.4.7
v2.4.6
v2.4.5
v2.4.4
v2.4.3
v2.4.2
v2.4.1
v2.4.0
v2.3.7
v2.4-beta1
v2.3.6
v2.3.5
v2.3.4
v2.3.3
v2.3.2
v2.3.1
v2.3.0
v2.2.10
v2.3-beta2
v2.2.9
v2.3-beta1
v2.2.8
v2.2.7
v2.2.6
v2.2.5
v2.2.4
v2.2.3
v2.2.2
v2.2.1
v2.2.0
v2.1.6
v2.2-beta2
v2.1.5
v2.2-beta1
v2.1.4
v2.1.3
v2.1.2
v2.1.1
v2.1.0
v2.0.10
v2.1-beta1
v2.0.9
v2.0.8
v2.0.7
v2.0.6
v2.0.5
v2.0.4
v2.0.3
v2.0.2
v2.0.1
v2.0.0
v2.0-beta3
v1.9.6
v1.9.5
v2.0-beta2
v1.9.4-r1
v1.9.3
v2.0-beta1
v1.9.2
v1.9.1
v1.9.0-r1
v1.8.4
v1.8.3
v1.8.2
v1.8.1
v1.8.0
v1.7.3
v1.7.2-r1
v1.7.1
v1.7.0
v1.6.3
v1.6.2-r1
v1.6.1-r1
1.6.1
v1.6.0
v1.5.2
v1.5.1
v1.5.0
v1.4.2
v1.4.1
v1.4.0
v1.3.2
v1.3.1
v1.3.0
v1.2.2
v1.2.1
v1.2.0
v1.1.0
v1.0.7-r1
v1.0.7
v1.0.6
v1.0.5
v1.0.4
v1.0.3-r1
v1.0.3
1.0.0
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
No Label
type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/netbox#1057
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @bdlamprecht on GitHub (Jun 26, 2017).
Issue type:
Bug
Python version:
2.7.12
NetBox version:
2.0.6
I can use the API to create new sites just fine (via the
Swagger UI), but when I try to add a new site with a previously definedcustom_field(via the admin panel in the WebUI), I get the following error:JSON parse error - Extra data: line 18 column 1 - line 18 column 2 (char 343 - 344)"This works:
This does not work:
The error that I receive is as follows (from
Swagger):I've used the
GETfunction to ensure that thecustom_fieldis a correct value. For example:@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
It looks like this might be an issue with the Swagger UI. When POSTing your example data with curl it works as expected:
Just to confirm, you created the custom field as an integer field, correct?
@bdlamprecht commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
No, it was created as a "Selection" field.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Jeremy Stretch notifications@github.com
wrote:
@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
POSTing the following works for me with a selection field:
Note that the value of the field is being passed as an integer. Passing the value as a string yields a validation error ("Invalid choice for field ce_qos_type: 6").
@bdlamprecht commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
@jeremystretch
I'm trying to get a string value to be stored in the dictionary "ce_qos_type" with one of two values.
Either:
I'm going to be using this with Ansible to setup QoS on our border devices, depending on whether the CE can handle
4 classesor6 classes.Perhaps I'm making this too complicated, if so, I'm open to suggestions.
@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
Selection fields have pre-defined values to choose from, created under the admin UI. You need to POST the primary key of the desired choice.
@bdlamprecht commented on GitHub (Jun 28, 2017):
The value of "1" is the primary key for "4_cos" above and the value of "2" is the primary key for "6_cos". This wasn't working in Swagger, and as you stated, it could be an error there, I'm not able to check today.
I'm a newbie on APIs, so tomorrow I'll investigate how to get a token in the CLI without using Swagger and report back.
Thanks for looking into this so quickly.
@bdlamprecht commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2017):
Well, I was able to test it and I CAN get it to work, although I don't understand an error I'm encountering.
I created a key for myself and used this on the CLI:
Which resulted in this error coming back:
So, I decided to try without the quotes around the value of
2for thece_qos_typeand it WORKED. What I don't understand is, why does the primary key forregionwork with quotes, but thiscustom_fielddoes not? I've triple-checked that all of my quotes have matching pairs and I'm not sure what else I'm missing.Anyways, since I've got this to work, I'm happy to close this issue and I'm very appreciative for you walking me through this, however, I'm still curious about the error. Let me know how you prefer me to proceed.
@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jun 29, 2017):
Custom fields are a bit odd because we're serializing the value of the field to emulate different data types (e.g. string, integer, or boolean). This inconsistency is likely due to enforcement of the integer type for select fields, if that makes sense. But to your point, NetBox should accept a number-as-a-string for custom fields if other primary key fields do. I'll have to look into it some more.