starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Prefix (Container) utilization does not calculate correctly when has children is Container #10549

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:33:02 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:33:02 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @emallette on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

Triage priority

N/A

NetBox Version

v4.1.7

Python Version

3.12

Steps to Reproduce

  1. I create a Container (Top-Level-Container) say 10.0.0.0/8
  2. I create a sub-tended container say 10.0.0.0/9.

The utilization of the top-level-container is immediately 50%. The sub-tended container utilization is 0%. Shouldn't it aggregate the utilization of the sub-tended containers ? It does not.

Expected Behavior

I would expect the top-level container to correctly reflect the utilization based on the sub-tended containers. In this case I would expect 0% utilization to still be shown.

Observed Behavior

50% utilization was shown rather than 0% utilization.
IPAM-Container

Originally created by @emallette on GitHub (Dec 8, 2024). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### Triage priority N/A ### NetBox Version v4.1.7 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. I create a Container (Top-Level-Container) say 10.0.0.0/8 2. I create a sub-tended container say 10.0.0.0/9. The utilization of the top-level-container is immediately 50%. The sub-tended container utilization is 0%. Shouldn't it aggregate the utilization of the sub-tended containers ? It does not. ### Expected Behavior I would expect the top-level container to correctly reflect the utilization based on the sub-tended containers. In this case I would expect 0% utilization to still be shown. ### Observed Behavior 50% utilization was shown rather than 0% utilization. ![IPAM-Container](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b88e779-a8b5-4d2b-ad9f-320de5132219)
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:33:02 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:33:03 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2024):

This is working as expected: The /9 container allocates 50% of its parent /8.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2024): This is working as expected: The /9 container allocates 50% of its parent /8.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10549
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?