starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Interface Type Addition: 1000Base-LX (GbE over fibre, non-modular) #10439

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:31:29 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:31:29 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @andytech77 on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @jmcguir on GitHub.

NetBox version

v4.1.6

Feature type

Data model extension

Triage priority

N/A

Proposed functionality

I would like to request that 1000Base-LX be added as an interface type in the "Ethernet (fixed)" category, to support legacy devices with fixed (non-modular) fibre interfaces.

Use case

We deal with some legacy telco devices and media converters that have fixed 1000Base-LX fibre interfaces (i.e. not SFP or any other kind of modular interface).

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @andytech77 on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024). Originally assigned to: @jmcguir on GitHub. ### NetBox version v4.1.6 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Triage priority N/A ### Proposed functionality I would like to request that 1000Base-LX be added as an interface type in the "Ethernet (fixed)" category, to support legacy devices with fixed (non-modular) fibre interfaces. ### Use case We deal with some legacy telco devices and media converters that have fixed 1000Base-LX fibre interfaces (i.e. not SFP or any other kind of modular interface). ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurecomplexity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:31:29 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:31:29 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:31:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024):

This would not be a data model extension tbc, it just needs an entry to be added to the appropriate section of InterfaceTypeChoices.

@bctiemann commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2024): This would not be a data model extension tbc, it just needs an entry to be added to the appropriate section of `InterfaceTypeChoices`.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:31:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jmcguir commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024):

@bctiemann I can take ownership of this and create a PR.

@jmcguir commented on GitHub (Nov 8, 2024): @bctiemann I can take ownership of this and create a PR.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10439
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?