starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add Outlet type C39 #10235

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:28:42 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:28:42 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Etibru on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @jsenecal on GitHub.

NetBox version

v4.0

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

It would be interesting to have the C39 outlet type (C13/C19
COMPATIBLE)

Use case

Add PDU models or other Eaton brand equipment to Netbox

Database changes

"type": {
        "value": "iec-60320-c39",
        "label": "C39"
    },

or

"type": {
        "value": "eaton-c39",
        "label": "C39"
    },

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @Etibru on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024). Originally assigned to: @jsenecal on GitHub. ### NetBox version v4.0 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality It would be interesting to have the C39 outlet type (C13/C19 COMPATIBLE) ### Use case Add PDU models or other Eaton brand equipment to Netbox ### Database changes ```json "type": { "value": "iec-60320-c39", "label": "C39" }, ``` or ```json "type": { "value": "eaton-c39", "label": "C39" }, ``` ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurecomplexity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:28:42 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:28:42 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:28:43 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024):

AFAICT C39 is not an IEC 60320 standard outlet type, but rather a proprietary form factor produced by Eaton. Is that accurate?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024): AFAICT C39 is not an [IEC 60320](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60320) standard outlet type, but rather a proprietary form factor produced by Eaton. Is that accurate?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:28:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Etibru commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024):

Exactly, it's an Eaton design, a bit like Juniper's VPC ports :

    "type": {
        "value": "juniper-vcp",
        "label": "Juniper VCP"
    },
@Etibru commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024): Exactly, it's an Eaton design, a bit like Juniper's VPC ports : ```json "type": { "value": "juniper-vcp", "label": "Juniper VCP" }, ```
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:28:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024):

Ok, just noting that this will need to be listed under the proprietary group and not IEC 60320.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024): Ok, just noting that this will need to be listed under the proprietary group and not IEC 60320.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:28:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024):

You can assign this to me
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/compare/develop...jsenecal:netbox:17471-c39

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (Sep 12, 2024): You can assign this to me https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/compare/develop...jsenecal:netbox:17471-c39
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10235
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?