starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add EVPN-VPWS to the L2VPNTypeChoices Choice set. #10119

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:27:07 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:07 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @caskings on GitHub (Aug 20, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @caskings on GitHub.

NetBox version

v4.0.9

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

EVPN-VPWS is a point to point L2VPN service that breaks the current model for VPWS and other P2P types in the L2VPN termination list as it allows for multiple interfaces across multiple network devices to the same endpoint or location. In either an Active / Active or Active / Passive mode.

Suggested change

Add TYPE_EVPN_VPWS to the L2VPNTypeChoices class, but don't add it to L2VPNTypeChoices.P2P

Relevant RFC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8214

Use case

This would allow Netbox users to model EVPN-VPWS separately from RFC4664 type VPWS which doesn't support Active / Active across multiple devices to the same location.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @caskings on GitHub (Aug 20, 2024). Originally assigned to: @caskings on GitHub. ### NetBox version v4.0.9 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality EVPN-VPWS is a point to point L2VPN service that breaks the current model for VPWS and other P2P types in the L2VPN termination list as it allows for multiple interfaces across multiple network devices to the same endpoint or location. In either an Active / Active or Active / Passive mode. Suggested change Add TYPE_EVPN_VPWS to the L2VPNTypeChoices class, but don't add it to L2VPNTypeChoices.P2P Relevant RFC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8214 ### Use case This would allow Netbox users to model EVPN-VPWS separately from RFC4664 type VPWS which doesn't support Active / Active across multiple devices to the same location. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurecomplexity: low labels 2025-12-29 21:27:07 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:27:07 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:07 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Brekmister commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

My work is moving towards EVPN-VPWS as well. This would be a nice addition to model.

@Brekmister commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): My work is moving towards EVPN-VPWS as well. This would be a nice addition to model.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@caskings commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024):

@DanSheps I'm happy to have a go at creating a pull request for this.

@caskings commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2024): @DanSheps I'm happy to have a go at creating a pull request for this.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ajackson79 commented on GitHub (Sep 6, 2024):

Adding another voice to this in hopes it gets added.

@ajackson79 commented on GitHub (Sep 6, 2024): Adding another voice to this in hopes it gets added.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:08 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2024):

@caskings Added you to work on it, please proceed with the PR

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 9, 2024): @caskings Added you to work on it, please proceed with the PR
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10119
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?