starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add 10base-X Interface types #10116

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:27:04 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:04 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jadyndev on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024).

NetBox version

v4.0.9

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Add -T and -F variants of 10base-X Ethernet in
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/dcim/choices.py#L818

This has been discussed in https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/5318
I'd like to add:

Use case

This will improve usage for users in an OT environment

Database changes

Add new types for 10base-X

External dependencies

none

Originally created by @jadyndev on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024). ### NetBox version v4.0.9 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality Add -T and -F variants of 10base-X Ethernet in https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/dcim/choices.py#L818 This has been discussed in https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/5318 I'd like to add: - Sadly 10base-X is still in use in *new* Devices in the OT-World. - One of many examples: https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/products/rack-mount-1u-ntp-server.htm - Maaany Programmable logic controllers use 10base-X and other weird/old connections/protocols - There is no significant impact by adding some new choices, even when few need them. (as the list is quite long anyway) ### Use case This will improve usage for users in an OT environment ### Database changes Add new types for 10base-X ### External dependencies none
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:27:04 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:04 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jadyndev commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024):

Connections like 10MHz/100MHz reference via BNC/SMA/etc. could be added as well.
(Those also have a comeback on high-bandwith equipment)

And while we're on it, antenna connections could be improved aswell

@jadyndev commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024): Connections like 10MHz/100MHz reference via BNC/SMA/etc. could be added as well. (Those also have a comeback on high-bandwith equipment) And while we're on it, antenna connections could be improved aswell
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

The example product you cited says it includes "2 x 10/100 MBit with RJ45 connector," which almost certainly implies 100Base-TX FastEthernet.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): The example product you cited says it includes "2 x 10/100 MBit with RJ45 connector," which almost certainly implies 100Base-TX FastEthernet.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jadyndev commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

My bad, I didn't recall that correctly. I've looked into the usage of 10Base-X a little deeper:
Many OT-Devices, especially in the industrial and power grid sector are connected via 2-Pair DLS or ISDN, sometimes even Ethernet packed into some even older industrial protocol

To be quite honest, I'd love to have >>10Base-X devices everywhere, but I need to know if there's something (either configured to be or limited by hardware) that's 10Base-X. There're already problems connecting 10/100Base-X devices to modern hardware as some don't support less than 1GE. In those cases I need to make sure that everything will work.

@jadyndev commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): My bad, I didn't recall that correctly. I've looked into the usage of 10Base-X a little deeper: Many OT-Devices, especially in the industrial and power grid sector are connected via 2-Pair DLS or ISDN, sometimes even Ethernet packed into some even older industrial protocol To be quite honest, I'd love to have >>10Base-X devices everywhere, but I need to know if there's something (either configured to be or limited by hardware) that's 10Base-X. There're already problems connecting 10/100Base-X devices to modern hardware as some don't support less than 1GE. In those cases I need to make sure that everything will work.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2025):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Do not attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2025): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. **Do not** attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025):

@jeremystretch I'd like to take this.

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 3, 2025): @jeremystretch I'd like to take this.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:27:06 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: low netbox pending closure status: needs owner type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10116
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?