starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Plugin Registry has incorrect information #10066

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:26:23 +01:00 by adam · 8 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:23 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @peteeckel on GitHub (Aug 9, 2024).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.1-beta1

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Look into the "Plugins" view under "Admin"/"System"

Expected Behavior

Correct information about installed and available plugins, obviously :-)

Observed Behavior

The NetBox DNS plugin is listed twice, probably because I have it installed.

Once under the correct name "NetBox DNS", which is listed in the section where installed plugins reside. It's marked as uncertified there.

Another entry shows it under the name "DNS", with the correct author information but marked as "not local", "not installed", and "Not certified".

Apparently, neither entry is correct.

Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 21 09 40
Originally created by @peteeckel on GitHub (Aug 9, 2024). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v4.1-beta1 ### Python Version 3.11 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Look into the "Plugins" view under "Admin"/"System" ### Expected Behavior Correct information about installed and available plugins, obviously :-) ### Observed Behavior The NetBox DNS plugin is listed twice, probably because I have it installed. Once under the correct name "NetBox DNS", which is listed in the section where installed plugins reside. It's marked as uncertified there. Another entry shows it under the name "DNS", with the correct author information but marked as "not local", "not installed", and "Not certified". Apparently, neither entry is correct. <img width="1262" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 21 09 40" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d51afded-529f-4c7d-b371-895442b82916">
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:26:24 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:24 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

Please provide reproduction steps. This plugin does not appear in the list without being installed locally.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): Please provide reproduction steps. This plugin does not appear in the list without being installed locally.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:24 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

I have a version installed on my development system, so the first entry is most definitely referring to this installation. But even if you disregard that one, the second one has the wrong certification status and the wrong name.

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): I have a version installed on my development system, so the first entry is most definitely referring to this installation. But even if you disregard that one, the second one has the wrong certification status and the wrong name.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:25 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

This is also consistent with the screenshot from the blog - wrong name, wrong status.

Screenshot 2024-08-10 at 16 10 38
@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): This is also consistent with the screenshot from the blog - wrong name, wrong status. <img width="968" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-10 at 16 10 38" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c517d0f3-a5c5-4bb9-8351-7507a6a28585">
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:25 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

Probably the two entries are a result of the name mismatch, which makes it impossible to correlate the installed one to the one from the registry. That leads me to the assumption that the entry in the registry is incorrect.

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): Probably the two entries are a result of the name mismatch, which makes it impossible to correlate the installed one to the one from the registry. That leads me to the assumption that the entry in the registry is incorrect.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:25 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

Ok, if the issue is simply that the plugins catalog has incorrect data, that's not something we can address in NetBox itself (and should not be filed as a bug report).

Could you please send an email to plugincatalog@netboxlabs.com with the details to be corrected?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): Ok, if the issue is simply that the plugins catalog has incorrect data, that's not something we can address in NetBox itself (and should not be filed as a bug report). Could you please send an email to `plugincatalog@netboxlabs.com` with the details to be corrected?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024):

Could you please send an email to plugincatalog@netboxlabs.com with the details to be corrected?

Sure, will do - thanks.

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2024): > Could you please send an email to `plugincatalog@netboxlabs.com` with the details to be corrected? Sure, will do - thanks.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024):

Hi @jeremystretch. meanwhile, thanks the help of Nat the information in the registry is fixed.

Certification status, author, publish and update time are still wrong once the plugin is installed.

Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 11 43 11

So I think this issue should be reopened.

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024): Hi @jeremystretch. meanwhile, thanks the help of Nat the information in the registry is fixed. Certification status, author, publish and update time are still wrong once the plugin is installed. <img width="1280" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 11 43 11" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/545252ff-a01e-4d76-b88a-018d8e38c261"> So I think this issue should be reopened.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:26:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024):

Current "feature" has this fixed - thanks!

@peteeckel commented on GitHub (Aug 19, 2024): Current "feature" has this fixed - thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#10066
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?