From 00aec79ee44767aa573f5eda67c8b8eedf394223 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: LGUG2Z Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 10:14:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] docs(repo): the same overlapping-tiles mutation turns kfw red 65 checks failed over 14 scenarios on Windows, all about geometry; rules and placement, which check only order, stayed green. --- docs/dev/BEHAVIOUR.md | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/dev/BEHAVIOUR.md b/docs/dev/BEHAVIOUR.md index ed63d50e..146edccf 100644 --- a/docs/dev/BEHAVIOUR.md +++ b/docs/dev/BEHAVIOUR.md @@ -124,7 +124,13 @@ overlap. `core-e2e` failed 7 checks and passed 139: the overlap checks of the su tiling and of the `tiling` scenario (two each), the one in the suite that says two windows share the screen again after a close, and the "not on each other" checks of `stacks` and of `closing` or `lifecycle`. Nothing else turned red, so the checks name what -is wrong. The same mutation on kfw is for its side to run. +is wrong. + +The same mutation on kfw, in a scratch worktree of `0ffc502c`: all 14 scenarios ran on restored +guests and 65 checks failed, every one of them about geometry: windows inside the work area, not +on each other, tiles sharing an edge (the precondition of `resize`), and each of the eight +`change-layout` lines of the `commands` sweep. `rules` (9) and `placement` (4) stayed green, +because they only check the order of windows. Nothing else turned red. ## What is not covered