Files
headscale/hscontrol/policy/policy_route_approval_test.go
Kristoffer Dalby 43afeedde2 all: apply golangci-lint 2.9.0 fixes
Fix issues found by the upgraded golangci-lint:
- wsl_v5: add required whitespace in CLI files
- staticcheck SA4006: replace new(var.Field) with &localVar
  pattern since staticcheck does not recognize Go 1.26
  new(value) as a use of the variable
- staticcheck SA5011: use t.Fatal instead of t.Error for
  nil guard checks so execution stops
- unused: remove dead ptrTo helper function
2026-02-19 08:21:23 +01:00

363 lines
10 KiB
Go

package policy
import (
"fmt"
"net/netip"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/util"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"gorm.io/gorm"
"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
"tailscale.com/types/key"
)
func TestApproveRoutesWithPolicy_NeverRemovesRoutes(t *testing.T) {
// Test policy that allows specific routes to be auto-approved
aclPolicy := `
{
"groups": {
"group:admins": ["test@"],
},
"acls": [
{"action": "accept", "src": ["*"], "dst": ["*:*"]},
],
"autoApprovers": {
"routes": {
"10.0.0.0/24": ["test@"],
"192.168.0.0/24": ["group:admins"],
"172.16.0.0/16": ["tag:approved"],
},
},
"tagOwners": {
"tag:approved": ["test@"],
},
}`
tests := []struct {
name string
currentApproved []netip.Prefix
announcedRoutes []netip.Prefix
nodeHostname string
nodeUser string
nodeTags []string
wantApproved []netip.Prefix
wantChanged bool
wantRemovedRoutes []netip.Prefix // Routes that should NOT be in the result
}{
{
name: "previously_approved_route_no_longer_advertised_remains",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"),
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"), // Only this one still advertised
},
nodeUser: "test",
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Should remain!
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"),
},
wantChanged: false,
wantRemovedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{}, // Nothing should be removed
},
{
name: "add_new_auto_approved_route_keeps_existing",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Still advertised
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"), // New route
},
nodeUser: "test",
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"), // Auto-approved via group
},
wantChanged: true,
},
{
name: "no_announced_routes_keeps_all_approved",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/16"),
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{}, // No routes announced anymore
nodeUser: "test",
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/16"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"),
},
wantChanged: false,
},
{
name: "manually_approved_route_not_in_policy_remains",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"), // Not in auto-approvers
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Can be auto-approved
},
nodeUser: "test",
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // New auto-approved
netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"), // Manual approval preserved
},
wantChanged: true,
},
{
name: "tagged_node_gets_tag_approved_routes",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/16"), // Tag-approved route
},
nodeUser: "test",
nodeTags: []string{"tag:approved"},
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Previous approval preserved
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/16"), // New tag-approved
},
wantChanged: true,
},
{
name: "complex_scenario_multiple_changes",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Will not be advertised
netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"), // Manual, not advertised
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"), // New, auto-approvable
netip.MustParsePrefix("172.16.0.0/16"), // New, not approvable (no tag)
netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24"), // New, not in policy
},
nodeUser: "test",
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Kept despite not advertised
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"), // New auto-approved
netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"), // Kept despite not advertised
},
wantChanged: true,
},
}
pmfs := PolicyManagerFuncsForTest([]byte(aclPolicy))
for _, tt := range tests {
for i, pmf := range pmfs {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%s-policy-index%d", tt.name, i), func(t *testing.T) {
// Create test user
user := types.User{
Model: gorm.Model{ID: 1},
Name: tt.nodeUser,
}
users := []types.User{user}
// Create test node
node := types.Node{
ID: 1,
MachineKey: key.NewMachine().Public(),
NodeKey: key.NewNode().Public(),
Hostname: tt.nodeHostname,
UserID: new(user.ID),
User: new(user),
RegisterMethod: util.RegisterMethodAuthKey,
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tt.announcedRoutes,
},
IPv4: new(netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.1")),
ApprovedRoutes: tt.currentApproved,
Tags: tt.nodeTags,
}
nodes := types.Nodes{&node}
// Create policy manager
pm, err := pmf(users, nodes.ViewSlice())
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NotNil(t, pm)
// Test ApproveRoutesWithPolicy
gotApproved, gotChanged := ApproveRoutesWithPolicy(
pm,
node.View(),
tt.currentApproved,
tt.announcedRoutes,
)
// Check change flag
assert.Equal(t, tt.wantChanged, gotChanged, "change flag mismatch")
// Check approved routes match expected
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.wantApproved, gotApproved, util.Comparers...); diff != "" {
t.Logf("Want: %v", tt.wantApproved)
t.Logf("Got: %v", gotApproved)
t.Errorf("unexpected approved routes (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
// Verify all previously approved routes are still present
for _, prevRoute := range tt.currentApproved {
assert.Contains(t, gotApproved, prevRoute,
"previously approved route %s was removed - this should NEVER happen", prevRoute)
}
// Verify no routes were incorrectly removed
for _, removedRoute := range tt.wantRemovedRoutes {
assert.NotContains(t, gotApproved, removedRoute,
"route %s should have been removed but wasn't", removedRoute)
}
})
}
}
}
func TestApproveRoutesWithPolicy_EdgeCases(t *testing.T) {
aclPolicy := `
{
"acls": [
{"action": "accept", "src": ["*"], "dst": ["*:*"]},
],
"autoApprovers": {
"routes": {
"10.0.0.0/8": ["test@"],
},
},
}`
tests := []struct {
name string
currentApproved []netip.Prefix
announcedRoutes []netip.Prefix
wantApproved []netip.Prefix
wantChanged bool
}{
{
name: "nil_current_approved",
currentApproved: nil,
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantChanged: true,
},
{
name: "empty_current_approved",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantChanged: true,
},
{
name: "duplicate_routes_handled",
currentApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"), // Duplicate
},
announcedRoutes: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantApproved: []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
},
wantChanged: true, // Duplicates are removed, so it's a change
},
}
pmfs := PolicyManagerFuncsForTest([]byte(aclPolicy))
for _, tt := range tests {
for i, pmf := range pmfs {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%s-policy-index%d", tt.name, i), func(t *testing.T) {
// Create test user
user := types.User{
Model: gorm.Model{ID: 1},
Name: "test",
}
users := []types.User{user}
node := types.Node{
ID: 1,
MachineKey: key.NewMachine().Public(),
NodeKey: key.NewNode().Public(),
Hostname: "testnode",
UserID: new(user.ID),
User: new(user),
RegisterMethod: util.RegisterMethodAuthKey,
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: tt.announcedRoutes,
},
IPv4: new(netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.1")),
ApprovedRoutes: tt.currentApproved,
}
nodes := types.Nodes{&node}
pm, err := pmf(users, nodes.ViewSlice())
require.NoError(t, err)
gotApproved, gotChanged := ApproveRoutesWithPolicy(
pm,
node.View(),
tt.currentApproved,
tt.announcedRoutes,
)
assert.Equal(t, tt.wantChanged, gotChanged)
if diff := cmp.Diff(tt.wantApproved, gotApproved, util.Comparers...); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("unexpected approved routes (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}
})
}
}
}
func TestApproveRoutesWithPolicy_NilPolicyManagerCase(t *testing.T) {
user := types.User{
Model: gorm.Model{ID: 1},
Name: "test",
}
userID := user.ID
currentApproved := []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("10.0.0.0/24"),
}
announcedRoutes := []netip.Prefix{
netip.MustParsePrefix("192.168.0.0/24"),
}
node := types.Node{
ID: 1,
MachineKey: key.NewMachine().Public(),
NodeKey: key.NewNode().Public(),
Hostname: "testnode",
UserID: &userID,
User: &user,
RegisterMethod: util.RegisterMethodAuthKey,
Hostinfo: &tailcfg.Hostinfo{
RoutableIPs: announcedRoutes,
},
IPv4: new(netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.1")),
ApprovedRoutes: currentApproved,
}
// With nil policy manager, should return current approved unchanged
gotApproved, gotChanged := ApproveRoutesWithPolicy(nil, node.View(), currentApproved, announcedRoutes)
assert.False(t, gotChanged)
assert.Equal(t, currentApproved, gotApproved)
}