starred/headscale
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git synced 2026-01-11 20:00:28 +01:00
Code Issues 98 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[Bug] 0.23.0-beta1 breaks DNS custom nameservers #745

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 02:23:10 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 02:23:10 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @MitchTalmadge on GitHub (Jul 23, 2024).

Is this a support request?

  • This is not a support request

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

After upgrading from 0.23.0-alpha12 to 0.23.0-beta1, with no other changes at all, queries made to 100.100.100.100 which should use a listed nameserver give status: NXDOMAIN.

image

Expected Behavior

Queries should return results from the nameservers

image

Steps To Reproduce

I use the following DNS config:

dns_config:
  override_local_dns: true
  nameservers:
    - 100.64.0.6
  restricted_nameservers:
    foo.bar: # Redacted
      - 100.64.0.2
    baz.foo: # Redacted
      - 100.64.0.2
  domains: []
  magic_dns: true
  base_domain: lorem.ipsum # Redacted

On alpha9, 10, 11, and 12, it works fine. On beta1, it fails.

Environment

- OS: Unraid 6.12.10, running Docker 24.0.9
- Headscale version: 0.23.0-beta1
- Tailscale version: 1.70.0 on MacOS Sonoma

Runtime environment

  • Headscale is behind a (reverse) proxy
  • Headscale runs in a container

Anything else?

No response

Originally created by @MitchTalmadge on GitHub (Jul 23, 2024). ### Is this a support request? - [X] This is not a support request ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues ### Current Behavior After upgrading from 0.23.0-alpha12 to 0.23.0-beta1, with no other changes at all, queries made to `100.100.100.100` which should use a listed `nameserver` give `status: NXDOMAIN`. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/541ba528-44c6-4961-a375-0013a45fc9e5) ### Expected Behavior Queries should return results from the `nameservers` ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31b4651c-a43d-4f88-a7db-485e9c27a8f9) ### Steps To Reproduce I use the following DNS config: ``` dns_config: override_local_dns: true nameservers: - 100.64.0.6 restricted_nameservers: foo.bar: # Redacted - 100.64.0.2 baz.foo: # Redacted - 100.64.0.2 domains: [] magic_dns: true base_domain: lorem.ipsum # Redacted ``` On alpha9, 10, 11, and 12, it works fine. On beta1, it fails. ### Environment ```markdown - OS: Unraid 6.12.10, running Docker 24.0.9 - Headscale version: 0.23.0-beta1 - Tailscale version: 1.70.0 on MacOS Sonoma ``` ### Runtime environment - [X] Headscale is behind a (reverse) proxy - [X] Headscale runs in a container ### Anything else? _No response_
adam added the bug label 2025-12-29 02:23:10 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 02:23:10 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 02:23:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@badsmoke commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2024):

hey a workaround is to add these domains in addition to the injecded config.

  # Search domains to inject.
  domains: [foo.bar, baz.fooz]
  
```
@badsmoke commented on GitHub (Jul 24, 2024): hey a workaround is to add these domains in addition to the injecded config. ```` # Search domains to inject. domains: [foo.bar, baz.fooz] ```
adam commented 2025-12-29 02:23:11 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kradalby commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024):

I've started on #2034, with some background on this mess up, would be keen to hear thoughts.

@kradalby commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024): I've started on #2034, with some background on this mess up, would be keen to hear thoughts.
adam commented 2025-12-29 02:23:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kradalby commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2024):

I think #2034 addresses this, would it be possible for you to help me test it? would be great to avoid another bad release like beta1.

Binary is available here: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/actions/runs/10195837541?pr=2034

@kradalby commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2024): I think #2034 addresses this, would it be possible for you to help me test it? would be great to avoid another bad release like beta1. Binary is available here: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/actions/runs/10195837541?pr=2034
adam commented 2025-12-29 02:23:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@MitchTalmadge commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):

Hey thank you for making a fix for this. I haven't had time to try it yet. I hope to find time soon. Thanks again

@MitchTalmadge commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024): Hey thank you for making a fix for this. I haven't had time to try it yet. I hope to find time soon. Thanks again
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
CLI
DERP
DNS
Nix
OIDC
SSH
bug
database
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
faq
good first issue
grants
help wanted
might-come
needs design doc
needs investigation
no-stale-bot
out of scope
performance
policy 📝
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
regression
routes
stale
tags
tailscale-feature-gap
well described ❤️
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/headscale#745
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?