Replace tiangolo/issue-manager with custom logic that distinguishes
bot comments from human responses. The issue-manager action treated
all comments equally, so the bot's own instruction comment would
trigger label removal on the next scheduled run.
Split into two jobs:
- remove-label-on-response: triggers on issue_comment from non-bot
users, removes the needs-more-info label immediately
- close-stale: runs on daily schedule, uses nushell to iterate open
needs-more-info issues, checks for human comments after the label
was added, and closes after 3 days with no response
Remove the `issues: labeled` trigger from the timer workflow.
When both workflows triggered on label addition, the comment workflow
would post the bot comment, and by the time the timer workflow ran,
issue-manager would see "a comment was added after the label" and
immediately remove the label due to `remove_label_on_comment: true`.
The timer workflow now only runs on:
- Daily cron (to close stale issues)
- issue_comment (to remove label when humans respond)
- workflow_dispatch (for manual testing)
Add GitHub Actions automation that helps manage issues requiring
additional information from reporters:
- Post an instruction comment when 'needs-more-info' label is added,
requesting environment details, debug logs from multiple nodes,
configuration files, and proper formatting
- Automatically remove the label when anyone comments
- Close the issue after 3 days if no response is provided
- Exempt needs-more-info labeled issues from the stale bot
The instruction comment includes guidance on:
- Required environment and debug information
- Collecting logs from both connecting and connected-to nodes
- Proper redaction rules (replace consistently, never remove IPs)
- Formatting requirements for attachments and Markdown
- Encouragement to discuss on Discord before filing issues
