mirror of
https://github.com/dehydrated-io/dehydrated.git
synced 2026-01-13 07:10:34 +01:00
force renew fails #338
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @geomunion on GitHub (Apr 25, 2018).
Hi, i'm having some trouble to force the renewing of a certificate with version 0.6.1.
Requesting a new certificate (
./dehydrated -c -d test.example.com) works fine,but an second run with
./dehydraded -c -x -d test.example.comfails.After some debugging i think there is a problem in
get_json_string_value()function or json is'nt proper grepped ....The "renew" JSON from
${challenge}contains a second 'url' and looks truncated:The JSON for a new cert-request didn't contains an
validationRecord- no second url:Anybody having same issue?
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2018):
Duplicate of #515 and #548. Update and try again. This should be fixed since over a month.
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Apr 25, 2018):
@geomunion can you give me some feedback after trying the current master version? I'm preparing a release with the fix and would like to know if it really works.
@yibfozzy commented on GitHub (May 8, 2018):
Hi, we are facing similar issue:
dehydrated -c -x -d example.com -d www.example.com
ERROR: Challenge is invalid! (returned: ) (result: wClXT0e2KS5ALWrs1sKsQoxzYUA8VQxxHai5TBvvdNA.NMCeBkC_6N-Gq1Z4PrGrUd-9noP83HtpQBuqhKlUAZ0)
"dehydrated -c -x -d example.com -d www.example.com" unexpectedly returned exit value 1 at /opt/perl/5.26/share/site/App/Cmd.pm line 468.
Dehydrated version: 0.6.1
openssl: OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
OS: CloudLinux Server release 6.9 (Igor Volk)
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (May 8, 2018):
@yibfozzy just update, that is already fixed in the 0.6.2 release.
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (May 8, 2018):
@yibfozzy oh wait it actually seems to be a completely different issue. are you using dns validation? this seems like a dns ttl/caching issue to me.
@yibfozzy commented on GitHub (May 8, 2018):
@lukas2511 yep, my bad, didn't pay attention that error was a bit different. We do not use dns validation, though this error does not appear with 0.6.2 version, so everything is ok now 👍