starred/dehydrated
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dehydrated-io/dehydrated.git synced 2026-07-22 12:58:34 +02:00
Code Issues 79 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Update license agreement (due at August 1st) #128

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 00:25:30 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 00:25:30 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @leonklingele on GitHub (Jul 10, 2016).

Let's Encrypt Subscriber,
We're writing to let you know that we're updating the Let's Encrypt Subscriber Agreement
effective August 1, 2016. You can find the updated agreement (v1.1.1) as well as the
current agreement (v1.0.1) in the "Let's Encrypt Subscriber Agreement" section of the
following page: https://letsencrypt.org/repository/

Old: https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.0.1-July-27-2015.pdf
New: https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf

What happens if one does not update letsencrypt.sh to post the new LA? Does the signing process fail?

Originally created by @leonklingele on GitHub (Jul 10, 2016). ``` Let's Encrypt Subscriber, We're writing to let you know that we're updating the Let's Encrypt Subscriber Agreement effective August 1, 2016. You can find the updated agreement (v1.1.1) as well as the current agreement (v1.0.1) in the "Let's Encrypt Subscriber Agreement" section of the following page: https://letsencrypt.org/repository/ ``` Old: https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.0.1-July-27-2015.pdf New: https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf What happens if one does not update letsencrypt.sh to post the new LA? Does the signing process fail?
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 00:25:30 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 00:25:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@germeier commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2016):

https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/lets-encrypt-subscriber-agreement-v1-1-1/17409/7

@germeier commented on GitHub (Jul 10, 2016): https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/lets-encrypt-subscriber-agreement-v1-1-1/17409/7
adam commented 2025-12-29 00:25:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016):

Interesting thing is that I can't yet push an update with the new agreement as boulder doesn't accept a registration with that url... Also this will lead to another wave of stupid issues "letsencrypt.sh is not working" "did you try updating?" "oh now it works"... meh.

@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016): Interesting thing is that I can't yet push an update with the new agreement as boulder doesn't accept a registration with that url... Also this will lead to another wave of stupid issues "letsencrypt.sh is not working" "did you try updating?" "oh now it works"... meh.
adam commented 2025-12-29 00:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@shoeper commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016):

https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/lets-encrypt-subscriber-agreement-v1-1-1/17409/7

@shoeper commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2016): https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/lets-encrypt-subscriber-agreement-v1-1-1/17409/7
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Complicated
bug
enhancement
help wanted
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 suggestions wanted
testing
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/dehydrated#128