Yellow, progress bar is not visible if the Book cover is also yellow:
Steps to Reproduce the Issue
Have a book entry with yellow Cover such as:
Listen to the audiobook.
What was Expected?
I would expect the color of the progress bar addapts to the cover.
Other approach would be adding black stroke to the yellow progress bar so it's more contrasting.
Above change would increase accessability as well.
Phone Model
Samsung Galaxy S10
Phone OS
Android 12
Audiobookshelf App Version
Android App - 0.9.81
Installation Source
Google Play Store
Additional Notes
I am not sure if it's a bug or a feature request really.
EDIT: Reduce image size
Originally created by @olek-osikowicz on GitHub (May 17, 2025).
### I have verified that the [bug is not already awaiting release](https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf-app/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20label%3A%22awaiting%20release%22)
Yes
### What was the Problem?
Yellow, progress bar is not visible if the Book cover is also yellow:
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be2c6710-d145-43c5-ace9-52c143cd0ad5" alt="Screen shot" width="400"/>
### Steps to Reproduce the Issue
1. Have a book entry with yellow Cover such as:
<img src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1738793078i/227073248.jpg" alt="cover" width="200"/>
2. Listen to the audiobook.
### What was Expected?
I would expect the color of the progress bar addapts to the cover.
Other approach would be adding black stroke to the yellow progress bar so it's more contrasting.
Above change would increase accessability as well.
### Phone Model
Samsung Galaxy S10
### Phone OS
Android 12
### Audiobookshelf App Version
Android App - 0.9.81
### Installation Source
Google Play Store
### Additional Notes
I am not sure if it's a bug or a feature request really.
EDIT: Reduce image size
adam
added the bug label 2026-04-24 23:53:51 +02:00
@nichwall commented on GitHub (May 17, 2025):
Same issue as https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf/issues/3825, but for the mobile apps instead of the web client
I added the same box shadow that was added in the web client here #3914
It isn't the same exact cover as you used in the screenshot. In the before screenshot it is more visible.
Before
After
@advplyr commented on GitHub (May 18, 2025):
I added the same box shadow that was added in the web client here [#3914](https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf/pull/3914)
It isn't the same exact cover as you used in the screenshot. In the before screenshot it is more visible.
### Before

### After

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2025):
Fixed in [v0.10.0-beta](https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf-app/releases/tag/v0.10.0-beta).
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @olek-osikowicz on GitHub (May 17, 2025).
I have verified that the bug is not already awaiting release
Yes
What was the Problem?
Yellow, progress bar is not visible if the Book cover is also yellow:

Steps to Reproduce the Issue
What was Expected?
I would expect the color of the progress bar addapts to the cover.
Other approach would be adding black stroke to the yellow progress bar so it's more contrasting.
Above change would increase accessability as well.
Phone Model
Samsung Galaxy S10
Phone OS
Android 12
Audiobookshelf App Version
Android App - 0.9.81
Installation Source
Google Play Store
Additional Notes
I am not sure if it's a bug or a feature request really.
EDIT: Reduce image size
@nichwall commented on GitHub (May 17, 2025):
Same issue as https://github.com/advplyr/audiobookshelf/issues/3825, but for the mobile apps instead of the web client
@advplyr commented on GitHub (May 18, 2025):
I added the same box shadow that was added in the web client here #3914
It isn't the same exact cover as you used in the screenshot. In the before screenshot it is more visible.
Before
After
@olek-osikowicz commented on GitHub (May 18, 2025):
Thank you @advplyr for a quick fix.
@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2025):
Fixed in v0.10.0-beta.