starred/WireMock.Net
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-05-21 23:46:56 +02:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Support for Faults #73

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 08:21:55 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:55 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @MiguelAlho on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018).

Originally assigned to: @StefH on GitHub.

Are there any plans for implementing the support for faulty responses, as in http://wiremock.org/docs/simulating-faults/ ?

Originally created by @MiguelAlho on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018). Originally assigned to: @StefH on GitHub. Are there any plans for implementing the support for faulty responses, as in http://wiremock.org/docs/simulating-faults/ ?
adam added the question label 2025-12-29 08:21:55 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 08:21:55 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018):

Can you explain which part of the faults functionality you would like to see in this project ?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018): Can you explain which part of the *faults* functionality you would like to see in this project ?
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018):

EMPTY_RESPONSE and MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK (at the end of the page) are currently interesting to me to create integratoon tests that verify a retry cycle. CONNECTION_RESET_BY_PEER also but that doesn't seem to be supported.

I'm also trying to figure out how to simulate a timeout...

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018): EMPTY_RESPONSE and MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK (at the end of the page) are currently interesting to me to create integratoon tests that verify a retry cycle. CONNECTION_RESET_BY_PEER also but that doesn't seem to be supported. I'm also trying to figure out how to simulate a timeout...
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018):

  1. EMPTY_RESPONSE - I'll take a look
  2. MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK - I'll take a look
  3. Timeout - Would this help you ? https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Stubbing-and-Request-Matching#simulating-delays
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018): 1. EMPTY_RESPONSE - I'll take a look 2. MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK - I'll take a look 3. Timeout - Would this help you ? https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Stubbing-and-Request-Matching#simulating-delays
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018):

I've been trying delay (response an extra second more then the amount of time i have for HttpClient timeout), but my instance o HttpClient seems to be receiving a 504 response than actually throwing the exception it's known to throw. I might need o up on the time on the delay to account for other factors.

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2018): I've been trying delay (response an extra second more then the amount of time i have for HttpClient timeout), but my instance o HttpClient seems to be receiving a 504 response than actually throwing the exception it's known to throw. I might need o up on the time on the delay to account for other factors.
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2018):

  1. EMPTY_RESPONSE ; That's just returning an empty byte[] or string ? This is already supported I think?
  2. MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK ; that's just returning a byte[] or random length / random data ?
  3. I will take a look
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2018): 1. EMPTY_RESPONSE ; That's just returning an empty byte[] or string ? This is already supported I think? 2. MALFORMED_RESPONSE_CHUNK ; that's just returning a byte[] or random length / random data ? 3. I will take a look
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:21:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (May 7, 2018):

(sorry for the delayed response). Yes, those seem to help. In the timeout case, I have figured out the problem to my approach, and fixed the setup. The delay setup on the mock server works correctly and is suficiente.

@MiguelAlho commented on GitHub (May 7, 2018): (sorry for the delayed response). Yes, those seem to help. In the timeout case, I have figured out the problem to my approach, and fixed the setup. The delay setup on the mock server works correctly and is suficiente.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label question
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net#73
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?