starred/WireMock.Net
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:32 +01:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Support for AwesomeAssertions #664

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 08:32:12 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:32:12 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jm-atbas on GitHub (Jan 22, 2025).

FluentAssertions recently switched to a commercial license: https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions/pull/2943 starting from version 8.X. This has led many looking for an alternative. One possible alternative has now emerged in the form of a community fork called AwesomeAssertions.

I would like WireMock to offer a NuGet package WireMock.Net.AwesomeAssertions to support this new library. It would essentially be a copy of the already existing integration for FluentAssertions since they are fully compatible. I would be open to create PR with the necessary changes.

Originally created by @jm-atbas on GitHub (Jan 22, 2025). [FluentAssertions](https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions) recently switched to a commercial license: https://github.com/fluentassertions/fluentassertions/pull/2943 starting from version `8.X`. This has led many looking for an alternative. One possible alternative has now emerged in the form of a community fork called [AwesomeAssertions](https://github.com/AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions). I would like WireMock to offer a NuGet package `WireMock.Net.AwesomeAssertions` to support this new library. It would essentially be a copy of the already existing integration for FluentAssertions since they are fully compatible. I would be open to create PR with the necessary changes.
adam added the feature label 2025-12-29 08:32:12 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 08:32:12 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:32:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jcfnomada commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025):

I do like this idea. It's actually just a copy of the same project, and changing the package from FluentAssertions to AwesomeAssertions (8.0.0). The namespaces are the same.

@jcfnomada commented on GitHub (Feb 4, 2025): I do like this idea. It's actually just a copy of the same project, and changing the package from FluentAssertions to AwesomeAssertions (8.0.0). The namespaces are the same.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net#664
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?