starred/WireMock.Net
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:32 +01:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Support OData #320

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @xadvfh on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020).

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Is there a way to support OData with the responses that we stub out in WireMock.Net?

Describe the solution you'd like
Given I stub a request to return a specific response
When a user requests the data with a OData query
Then the response should only include the data the query specifies

Describe alternatives you've considered
Stubbing every single query used

Is your feature request supported by WireMock (java version)? Please provide details.
Only via stubbing each query

Additional context
#72 talks about stubbing a specific OData query but I'm wondering if this is something that could be built in.

Originally created by @xadvfh on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020). **Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** Is there a way to support [OData](https://www.odata.org/) with the responses that we stub out in WireMock.Net? **Describe the solution you'd like** Given I stub a request to return a specific response When a user requests the data with a OData query Then the response should only include the data the query specifies **Describe alternatives you've considered** Stubbing every single query used **Is your feature request supported by [WireMock (java version)](https://www.wiremock.org)? Please provide details.** Only via stubbing each query **Additional context** #72 talks about stubbing a specific OData query but I'm wondering if this is something that could be built in.
adam added the wontfix label 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020):

OData is just a specification.

With WireMock.Net you can stub any request and response.

Or do you have a different question?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020): OData is just a specification. With WireMock.Net you can stub any request and response. Or do you have a different question?
adam commented 2025-12-29 08:26:05 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@xadvfh commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020):

I guess I was wondering if there is a way for wiremock to autogenerate the stubs based on a request. I'm not even sure if this is possible but here is what I had floating around in my head.

Assuming the response is a json object, if there was a stub like this:

server
	.Given(Request.Create()
		.WithPath($"/personal/api/v2/Accounts/11234567890")
		.UsingGet()
		.StubODataQueries());
	.RespondWith(Response.Create()
		.WithStatusCode(200)
		.WithHeader(ResponseConstants.ContentTypeKey, ResponseConstants.ContentTypeJson)
		.WithBodyAsJson(CreateResponse(accountSection)));

When a request matches that path but has an OData query attached to it, it would take the response that the user specified in WithBodyAsJson and create a new one based on the OData query.

@xadvfh commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2020): I guess I was wondering if there is a way for wiremock to autogenerate the stubs based on a request. I'm not even sure if this is possible but here is what I had floating around in my head. Assuming the response is a json object, if there was a stub like this: ``` c# server .Given(Request.Create() .WithPath($"/personal/api/v2/Accounts/11234567890") .UsingGet() .StubODataQueries()); .RespondWith(Response.Create() .WithStatusCode(200) .WithHeader(ResponseConstants.ContentTypeKey, ResponseConstants.ContentTypeJson) .WithBodyAsJson(CreateResponse(accountSection))); ``` When a request matches that path but has an OData query attached to it, it would take the response that the user specified in `WithBodyAsJson` and create a new one based on the OData query.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label wontfix
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net#320
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?