WireMock.Net is not compatible with Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 3.1.1 #264

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

You mean this issue ? https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447 ?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): You mean this issue ? https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447 ?

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

OK, I see your error:

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): OK, I see your error: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/249938/77955378-5ef37900-72d0-11ea-96fa-a7b3944a1edb.png)

adam commented

https://github.com/oleg-shilo/cs-script.core/issues/7

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): https://github.com/oleg-shilo/cs-script.core/issues/7

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

@mc0re & @igorquintaes
Can you please try new version from MyGet : WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091 ?

Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): @mc0re & @igorquintaes Can you please try new version from MyGet : `WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091` ? Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.

adam commented

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

I will as soon as it gets through to our nuget mirror...

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): I will as soon as it gets through to our nuget mirror...

adam commented

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

@mc0re & @igorquintaes
Can you please try new version from MyGet : WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091 ?

Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.

Now there is another conflict detected:
Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 3.1.1: Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Common (= 3.3.1)
CS-Script.Core 1.3.1: Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Common (= 3.4.0)

There is no need to solve my problem in urgency, since CodeGeneration is not a required package to my team; but i am glad for your fast response and to try helping us. Is possible that mc0re issue is a little different, since i am getting trouble on build, and mc0re is on runtime.

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): > @mc0re & @igorquintaes > Can you please try new version from MyGet : `WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091` ? > > Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test. Now there is another conflict detected: Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design 3.1.1: Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Common (= 3.3.1) CS-Script.Core 1.3.1: Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Common (= 3.4.0) There is no need to solve my problem in urgency, since CodeGeneration is not a required package to my team; but i am glad for your fast response and to try helping us. Is possible that mc0re issue is a little different, since i am getting trouble on build, and mc0re is on runtime.

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

@igorquintaes : Do you really need that Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design ?

Because this answer suggest to remove it : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50689098/how-can-i-upgrade-from-net-core-2-1-rc1-to-the-stable-version-of-net-core-2-1/50788326#50788326

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): @igorquintaes : Do you really need that `Microsoft.VisualStudio.Web.CodeGeneration.Design` ? Because this answer suggest to remove it : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50689098/how-can-i-upgrade-from-net-core-2-1-rc1-to-the-stable-version-of-net-core-2-1/50788326#50788326

adam commented

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

For now I don't, as I told that the package is not required to my team. Before open this issue, I removed it from project and worked fine, so and now i am working without that package. But in case of someone faces the same error, i decided to open a issue here.

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): For now I don't, as I told that the package is not required to my team. Before open this issue, I removed it from project and worked fine, so and now i am working without that package. But in case of someone faces the same error, i decided to open a issue here.

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

This issue is actually unsolvable because a fixed version is always needed.
I did ask a question here: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/42935

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): This issue is actually unsolvable because a fixed version is always needed. I did ask a question here: https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/42935

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

I just got the answer, see https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/42935.

So in your case, search for the last dependency which uses a fixed version, and update that version to the same as CS-Script.Core uses.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): I just got the answer, see https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/issues/42935. So in your case, search for the last dependency which uses a fixed version, and update that version to the same as CS-Script.Core uses.

adam commented

https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Conflict-on-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Conflict-on-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp

adam commented

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

Got it, looks nice. Would not be the case that CS-Script.Core add Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces on its dependencies, using the same version that themselves use? I don't know if you are a contributor in that lib too, but looks more a lib limitation than a problem that the final developer should be handle

@igorquintaes commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): Got it, looks nice. Would not be the case that CS-Script.Core add `Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces` on its dependencies, using the same version that themselves use? I don't know if you are a contributor in that lib too, but looks more a lib limitation than a problem that the final developer should be handle

adam commented

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

There are probably more libraries which use a fixed version. It's not possible for cs-script.core to include all these...

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): There are probably more libraries which use a fixed version. It's not possible for cs-script.core to include all these...

adam commented