mirror of
https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git
synced 2026-01-11 21:10:32 +01:00
Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 #262
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @mc0re on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020).
The biggest problem integrating WireMock with the new .NET is JSON parsers and ASP.NET - in particular, CodeAnalysis.CSharp package.
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):
I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case.
Will this solve your issue?
About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.
@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):
Yes it will, I suppose 😊
As a side note, people often switch to a newer .NET version starting from a certain release and never go back.
From: Stef Heyenrathmailto:notifications@github.com
Sent: 27 March 2020 12:17
To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Netmailto:WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com
Cc: mc0remailto:mnikitin@hotmail.com; Authormailto:author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447)
I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case.
Will this solve your issue?
About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-604945549, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3VNT3HND4DS7I5PCD3RJSDMDANCNFSM4LU5THCA.
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020):
A preview version has been created (
WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test?See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions
@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020):
On Monday...
From: Stef Heyenrath notifications@github.com
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:52:14 AM
To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com
Cc: mc0re mnikitin@hotmail.com; Author author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447)
A preview version has been created (WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test?
See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-605421250, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3UAIV3YDF2CMFC7DN3RJXCE5ANCNFSM4LU5THCA.
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):
https://github.com/oleg-shilo/cs-script.core/issues/7
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):
@mc0re & @igorquintaes
Can you please try new version from MyGet :
WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091?Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.
@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):
https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Conflict-on-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp
@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):
Great, thanks!