Initial code (copy)

src/WireMock/RequestPathSpec.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis;
+
+[module:
+    SuppressMessage("StyleCop.CSharp.ReadabilityRules",
+        "SA1101:PrefixLocalCallsWithThis",
+        Justification = "Reviewed. Suppression is OK here, as it conflicts with internal naming rules.")]
+[module:
+    SuppressMessage("StyleCop.CSharp.NamingRules",
+        "SA1309:FieldNamesMustNotBeginWithUnderscore",
+        Justification = "Reviewed. Suppression is OK here, as it conflicts with internal naming rules.")]
+[module:
+    SuppressMessage("StyleCop.CSharp.DocumentationRules",
+        "SA1633:FileMustHaveHeader",
+        Justification = "Reviewed. Suppression is OK here, as unknown copyright and company.")]
+// ReSharper disable ArrangeThisQualifier
+// ReSharper disable InconsistentNaming
+namespace WireMock
+{
+    /// <summary>
+    /// The request path spec.
+    /// </summary>
+    public class RequestPathSpec : ISpecifyRequests
+    {
+        /// <summary>
+        /// The _path.
+        /// </summary>
+        private readonly string _path;
+
+        /// <summary>
+        /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="RequestPathSpec"/> class.
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <param name="path">
+        /// The path.
+        /// </param>
+        public RequestPathSpec(string path)
+        {
+            _path = path;
+        }
+
+        /// <summary>
+        /// The is satisfied by.
+        /// </summary>
+        /// <param name="request">
+        /// The request.
+        /// </param>
+        /// <returns>
+        /// The <see cref="bool"/>.
+        /// </returns>
+        public bool IsSatisfiedBy(Request request)
+        {
+            return WildcardPatternMatcher.MatchWildcardString(_path, request.Path);
+        }
+    }
+}