Feature Request: Add minimal-API-style routing as Extension Package #707

New Issue

Closed

opened 2025-12-29 15:31:29 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:29 +01:00

Owner

Copy Link

Originally created by @GennadyGS on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @StefH on GitHub.

Proposal: Add the routing features implemented in the WireMock.Net.Routing library (https://github.com/GennadyGS/WireMock.Net.Routing) to WireMock.Net as an extension package under the https://github.com/wiremock organization.

Details:

• The WireMock.Net.Routing library provides minimal-API-style routing for WireMock.Net.
• It provides extension methods for expressive, maintainable, and testable HTTP routing, inspired by ASP.NET Core Minimal APIs.
• It can serve as a reference implementation for the proposed extension package.
• Integrating these features as an official extension will benefit users who need more flexible routing in their WireMock.Net setups.

Reference:

• Example implementation: https://github.com/GennadyGS/WireMock.Net.Routing

Please consider this feature request and evaluate the possibility of adding these routing features as an extension package.

Originally created by @GennadyGS on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025). Originally assigned to: @StefH on GitHub. Proposal: Add the routing features implemented in the WireMock.Net.Routing library (https://github.com/GennadyGS/WireMock.Net.Routing) to WireMock.Net as an extension package under the https://github.com/wiremock organization. Details: - The WireMock.Net.Routing library provides minimal-API-style routing for WireMock.Net. - It provides extension methods for expressive, maintainable, and testable HTTP routing, inspired by [ASP.NET Core Minimal APIs](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/minimal-apis?view=aspnetcore-9.0). - It can serve as a reference implementation for the proposed extension package. - Integrating these features as an official extension will benefit users who need more flexible routing in their WireMock.Net setups. Reference: - Example implementation: https://github.com/GennadyGS/WireMock.Net.Routing Please consider this feature request and evaluate the possibility of adding these routing features as an extension package.

adam added the feature label 2025-12-29 15:31:29 +01:00

adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 15:31:30 +01:00

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:30 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025):

@GennadyGS
Interesting idea!

I'm thinking if this needs to be a separate project or just be included is this solution...

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025): @GennadyGS Interesting idea! I'm thinking if this needs to be a separate project or just be included is this solution...

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:31 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025):

Thanks for response.

I think it would be better to add the extension directly into the main solution—either as a separate package or inside the main package. I'm totally fine with both options.

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 5, 2025): Thanks for response. I think it would be better to add the extension directly into the main solution—either as a separate package or inside the main package. I'm totally fine with both options.

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:31 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025):

Best is inside this repo + solution.

Maybe as name WireMock.Net.Extensions.Routing because it's an extension to to main logic?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025): Best is inside this repo + solution. Maybe as name `WireMock.Net.Extensions.Routing` because it's an extension to to main logic?

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:31 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025):

Agree

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025): Agree

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:32 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025):

Is anything required from me?

@GennadyGS commented on GitHub (Aug 9, 2025): Is anything required from me?

adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:32 +01:00

Author

Owner

Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025):

You can create a PR which adds this src + test.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2025): You can create a PR which adds this src + test.

adam referenced this issue 2025-12-29 15:35:00 +01:00

[PR #707] [MERGED] Use NuGet "Stef.Validation" #1046

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Branch/Tag Specified

Branches Tags

master

mime-part-matcher

version-2.x

MappingSerializer

1341-mapping-json

stef-aspire-tests-updates

bug/973-TinyMapper

bug/1149-AppendGuidToSavedMappingFile

feature/1150-DockerImageVersion

61

stef-1108

stef-1097

stef-1083-MessageOptions_Type_Conflict

stef-1062-logger

stef-IgnoreOpenApiErrors

stef-928-TypeLoadException-FluentAssertions-net472

nunit

stef-849

stef-847-regex-questionmark

http_verb

WireMockServerContext

webapp

ai

CommandLineArgumentsParser

1.23.0

1.22.0

1.21.0

1.20.0

1.19.0

1.18.0

1.17.0

1.16.0

1.15.0

1.14.0

1.13.0

1.12.0

1.11.2

1.11.0

1.10.1

1.10.0

1.9.1

1.9.0

1.8.18

1.8.17

1.8.16

1.8.15

1.8.14

1.8.13

1.8.12

1.8.11

1.8.10

1.8.9

1.8.8

1.8.7

1.8.6

1.8.5

1.8.3

1.8.2

1.8.1

1.8.0

1.7.4

1.7.3

1.7.2

1.7.1

1.7.0

1.6.12

1.6.11

1.6.10

1.6.9

1.6.8

1.6.7

1.6.6

1.6.5

1.6.4

1.6.3

1.6.2

1.6.1

1.6.0

1.5.62

1.5.61

1.5.60

1.5.59

1.5.58

1.5.57

1.5.56

1.5.55

1.5.54

1.5.53

1.5.52

1.5.51

1.5.50

1.5.49

1.5.48

1.5.47

1.5.46

1.5.45

1.5.44

1.5.43

1.5.42

1.5.41

1.5.40

1.5.39

1.5.38

1.5.37

1.5.36

1.5.35

1.5.34

1.5.33

1.5.32

1.5.31

1.5.30

1.5.29

1.5.28

1.5.27

1.5.26

1.5.25

1.5.24

1.5.23

1.5.22

1.5.21

1.5.20

1.5.19

1.5.18

1.5.17

1.5.16

1.5.15

1.5.14

1.5.13

1.5.12

1.5.11

1.5.10

1.5.9

1.5.8

1.5.7

1.5.6

1.5.5

1.5.4

1.5.3

1.5.2

1.5.1

1.5.0

1.4.43

1.4.42

1.4.41

1.4.40

1.4.39

1.4.38

1.4.37

1.4.36

1.4.35

1.4.34

1.4.33

1.4.32

1.4.31

1.4.30

1.4.29

1.4.28

1.4.27

1.4.26

1.4.25

1.4.24

1.4.23

1.4.22

1.4.21

1.4.20

1.4.19

1.4.18

1.4.17

1.4.16

1.4.15

1.4.14

1.4.13

1.4.12

1.4.11

1.4.10

1.4.9

1.4.8

1.4.7

1.4.6

1.4.5

1.4.4

1.4.3

1.4.2

1.4.1

1.4.0

1.3.10

1.3.9

1.3.8

1.3.6

1.3.5

1.3.4

1.3.3

1.3.2

1.3.1

1.3.0

1.2.18

1.2.17

1.2.16

1.2.15

1.2.14

1.2.13

1.2.12

1.2.11.0

1.2.10

1.2.9.0

1.2.8.0

1.2.7.0

1.2.6.0

1.2.5.0

1.2.4.0

1.2.3.0

1.2.2.0

1.2.1.0

1.2.0.0

1.1.10

1.1.9.0

1.1.8.0

1.1.7.0

1.1.6.0

1.1.5.0

1.1.3.0

1.1.2.0

1.1.1.0

1.1.0.0

1.0.43.0

1.0.42.0

1.0.41.0

1.0.40.0

1.0.39.0

1.0.38.0

1.0.37.0

1.0.36.0

1.0.35.0

1.0.34.0

1.0.33.0

1.0.32.0

1.0.31.0

1.0.29.0

1.0.28.0

1.0.25.0

1.0.24.0

1.0.23.0

1.0.22.0

1.0.21.0

1.0.20.0

1.0.19.0

1.0.18.0

1.0.17.0

1.0.16.0

1.0.15.0

1.0.14.0

1.0.13.0

1.0.12.0

1.0.11.0

1.0.10.0

1.0.9.0

1.0.8.0

1.0.7.0

1.0.6.1

1.0.6

1.0.5

1.0.4.21

1.0.4.20

1.0.4.19

1.0.4.18

1.0.4.17

1.0.4.16

1.0.4.15

1.0.4.14

1.0.4.13

1.0.4.12

1.0.4.11

1.0.4.10

1.0.4.9

1.0.4.8

1.0.4.7

1.0.4.6

1.0.4.5

1.0.4.4

1.0.4.3

1.0.4.2

1.0.4.1

1.0.4.0

1.0.3.20

1.0.3.19

1.0.3.18

1.0.3.17

1.0.3.16

1.0.3.15

1.0.3.14

1.0.3.13

1.0.3.12

1.0.3.11

1.0.3.10

1.0.3.9

1.0.3.8

1.0.3.7

1.0.3.6

1.0.3.5

1.0.3.4

1.0.3.3

1.0.3.2

1.0.3.1

1.0.3.0

1.0.2.13

1.0.2.12

1.0.2.11

1.0.2.10

1.0.2.9

1.0.2.8

1.0.2.7

1.0.2.6

1.0.2.5

1.0.2.4

1.0.2.1

1.0.2.0

1.0.1.5

1.0.1.3

1.0.1.2

1.0.1.1

1.0.0.0

Labels

Clear labels

bug

bug

doc

doc

duplicate

feature

feature

invalid

pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

question

wontfix

No Label feature

Milestone

No items

No Milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

adam

No Assignees

1 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#707