mirror of
https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git
synced 2026-08-31 16:07:30 +02:00
JsonPartialMatcher - match guid and string #529
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 15:26:00 +01:00 by adam
·
2 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
1341-mapping-json
stef-aspire-tests-updates
bug/973-TinyMapper
bug/1149-AppendGuidToSavedMappingFile
feature/1150-DockerImageVersion
61
stef-1108
stef-1097
stef-1083-MessageOptions_Type_Conflict
stef-1062-logger
stef-IgnoreOpenApiErrors
stef-928-TypeLoadException-FluentAssertions-net472
nunit
stef-849
stef-847-regex-questionmark
http_verb
WireMockServerContext
webapp
ai
CommandLineArgumentsParser
2.15.0
2.14.0
2.13.0
2.12.0
2.11.0
2.10.0
2.9.0
2.8.0
2.7.0
2.6.0
2.5.0
2.4.0
2.3.0
2.2.0
2.1.0
2.0.0
1.25.0
1.24.0
1.23.0
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.0
1.17.0
1.16.0
1.15.0
1.14.0
1.13.0
1.12.0
1.11.2
1.11.0
1.10.1
1.10.0
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.18
1.8.17
1.8.16
1.8.15
1.8.14
1.8.13
1.8.12
1.8.11
1.8.10
1.8.9
1.8.8
1.8.7
1.8.6
1.8.5
1.8.3
1.8.2
1.8.1
1.8.0
1.7.4
1.7.3
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.12
1.6.11
1.6.10
1.6.9
1.6.8
1.6.7
1.6.6
1.6.5
1.6.4
1.6.3
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.62
1.5.61
1.5.60
1.5.59
1.5.58
1.5.57
1.5.56
1.5.55
1.5.54
1.5.53
1.5.52
1.5.51
1.5.50
1.5.49
1.5.48
1.5.47
1.5.46
1.5.45
1.5.44
1.5.43
1.5.42
1.5.41
1.5.40
1.5.39
1.5.38
1.5.37
1.5.36
1.5.35
1.5.34
1.5.33
1.5.32
1.5.31
1.5.30
1.5.29
1.5.28
1.5.27
1.5.26
1.5.25
1.5.24
1.5.23
1.5.22
1.5.21
1.5.20
1.5.19
1.5.18
1.5.17
1.5.16
1.5.15
1.5.14
1.5.13
1.5.12
1.5.11
1.5.10
1.5.9
1.5.8
1.5.7
1.5.6
1.5.5
1.5.4
1.5.3
1.5.2
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.43
1.4.42
1.4.41
1.4.40
1.4.39
1.4.38
1.4.37
1.4.36
1.4.35
1.4.34
1.4.33
1.4.32
1.4.31
1.4.30
1.4.29
1.4.28
1.4.27
1.4.26
1.4.25
1.4.24
1.4.23
1.4.22
1.4.21
1.4.20
1.4.19
1.4.18
1.4.17
1.4.16
1.4.15
1.4.14
1.4.13
1.4.12
1.4.11
1.4.10
1.4.9
1.4.8
1.4.7
1.4.6
1.4.5
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.10
1.3.9
1.3.8
1.3.6
1.3.5
1.3.4
1.3.3
1.3.2
1.3.1
1.3.0
1.2.18
1.2.17
1.2.16
1.2.15
1.2.14
1.2.13
1.2.12
1.2.11.0
1.2.10
1.2.9.0
1.2.8.0
1.2.7.0
1.2.6.0
1.2.5.0
1.2.4.0
1.2.3.0
1.2.2.0
1.2.1.0
1.2.0.0
1.1.10
1.1.9.0
1.1.8.0
1.1.7.0
1.1.6.0
1.1.5.0
1.1.3.0
1.1.2.0
1.1.1.0
1.1.0.0
1.0.43.0
1.0.42.0
1.0.41.0
1.0.40.0
1.0.39.0
1.0.38.0
1.0.37.0
1.0.36.0
1.0.35.0
1.0.34.0
1.0.33.0
1.0.32.0
1.0.31.0
1.0.29.0
1.0.28.0
1.0.25.0
1.0.24.0
1.0.23.0
1.0.22.0
1.0.21.0
1.0.20.0
1.0.19.0
1.0.18.0
1.0.17.0
1.0.16.0
1.0.15.0
1.0.14.0
1.0.13.0
1.0.12.0
1.0.11.0
1.0.10.0
1.0.9.0
1.0.8.0
1.0.7.0
1.0.6.1
1.0.6
1.0.5
1.0.4.21
1.0.4.20
1.0.4.19
1.0.4.18
1.0.4.17
1.0.4.16
1.0.4.15
1.0.4.14
1.0.4.13
1.0.4.12
1.0.4.11
1.0.4.10
1.0.4.9
1.0.4.8
1.0.4.7
1.0.4.6
1.0.4.5
1.0.4.4
1.0.4.3
1.0.4.2
1.0.4.1
1.0.4.0
1.0.3.20
1.0.3.19
1.0.3.18
1.0.3.17
1.0.3.16
1.0.3.15
1.0.3.14
1.0.3.13
1.0.3.12
1.0.3.11
1.0.3.10
1.0.3.9
1.0.3.8
1.0.3.7
1.0.3.6
1.0.3.5
1.0.3.4
1.0.3.3
1.0.3.2
1.0.3.1
1.0.3.0
1.0.2.13
1.0.2.12
1.0.2.11
1.0.2.10
1.0.2.9
1.0.2.8
1.0.2.7
1.0.2.6
1.0.2.5
1.0.2.4
1.0.2.1
1.0.2.0
1.0.1.5
1.0.1.3
1.0.1.2
1.0.1.1
1.0.0.0
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#529
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @timurnes on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023).
As a WireMock user I'd like to setup JsonPartialMatcher using anonymous object with some Guid fields.
As of now I have to cast Guid fields to string because this condition in AbstractJsonPartialMatcher rejects match - value type is JTokenType.Guid and input type is JTokenType.String.
Generally, guid in json is a string so I think this feature can simplify user code a bit and won't be a breaking change
Possible solution is to add a check before the condition I've specified above
Unit test in JsonPartialMatcherTests:
@StefH commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):
@timurnes
Looks ok to me.
Can you make a PR with code change + unit tests?
However I think that this same logic needs to be applied to line 66 if a Regex is used:
@timurnes commented on GitHub (Jul 19, 2023):
@StefH
Created PR #972
I haven't added any changes to Regex logic because I can't imagine how we can create valid regex with Guid type. So Guid field will be skipped and matched on the next condition that is added with this PR