starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-08-01 17:58:40 +02:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 #264

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 15:19:18 +01:00 by adam · 8 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:18 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @mc0re on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020).

The biggest problem integrating WireMock with the new .NET is JSON parsers and ASP.NET - in particular, CodeAnalysis.CSharp package.

Originally created by @mc0re on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020). The biggest problem integrating WireMock with the new .NET is JSON parsers and ASP.NET - in particular, CodeAnalysis.CSharp package.
adam added the feature label 2025-12-29 15:19:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 15:19:18 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case.

Will this solve your issue?

About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case. Will this solve your issue? About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020):

Yes it will, I suppose 😊

As a side note, people often switch to a newer .NET version starting from a certain release and never go back.

From: Stef Heyenrathmailto:notifications@github.com
Sent: 27 March 2020 12:17
To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Netmailto:WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com
Cc: mc0remailto:mnikitin@hotmail.com; Authormailto:author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447)

I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case.

Will this solve your issue?

About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-604945549, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3VNT3HND4DS7I5PCD3RJSDMDANCNFSM4LU5THCA.

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2020): Yes it will, I suppose 😊 As a side note, people often switch to a newer .NET version starting from a certain release and never go back. From: Stef Heyenrath<mailto:notifications@github.com> Sent: 27 March 2020 12:17 To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net<mailto:WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com> Cc: mc0re<mailto:mnikitin@hotmail.com>; Author<mailto:author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447) I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case. Will this solve your issue? About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-604945549>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3VNT3HND4DS7I5PCD3RJSDMDANCNFSM4LU5THCA>.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020):

A preview version has been created (WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test?

See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020): A preview version has been created (`WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032`) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test? See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020):

On Monday...

From: Stef Heyenrath notifications@github.com
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:52:14 AM
To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com
Cc: mc0re mnikitin@hotmail.com; Author author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447)

A preview version has been created (WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test?

See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-605421250, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3UAIV3YDF2CMFC7DN3RJXCE5ANCNFSM4LU5THCA.

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2020): On Monday... ________________________________ From: Stef Heyenrath <notifications@github.com> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:52:14 AM To: WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net <WireMock.Net@noreply.github.com> Cc: mc0re <mnikitin@hotmail.com>; Author <author@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net] Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 (#447) A preview version has been created (WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test? See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/issues/447#issuecomment-605421250>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEWR3UAIV3YDF2CMFC7DN3RJXCE5ANCNFSM4LU5THCA>.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

https://github.com/oleg-shilo/cs-script.core/issues/7

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): https://github.com/oleg-shilo/cs-script.core/issues/7
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020):

@mc0re & @igorquintaes
Can you please try new version from MyGet : WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091 ?

Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2020): @mc0re & @igorquintaes Can you please try new version from MyGet : `WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091` ? Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:21 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Conflict-on-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp

@StefH commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Conflict-on-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:19:21 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020):

Great, thanks!

@mc0re commented on GitHub (Mar 31, 2020): Great, thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No labels feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#264