starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-01-11 22:30:41 +01:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

WithCallback leads to empty response #222

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Mies75 on GitHub (Oct 15, 2019).

When I use .WithBody(@"<soapenv:Envelope etc. I get a response that is can be handled well by our applications.

However when we use a callback, the response message is empty :

.WithCallback(req =>
{
	return CoverApplicationResponseBuilder.CreateResponse(req);
})

public class CoverApplicationResponseBuilder
{
	public static ResponseMessage CreateResponse(RequestMessage requestSoapMessage)
	{
		//get some vars from the requestSoapMessage (excerpt)
		XDocument doc = XDocument.Parse(requestSoapMessage.Body);

		//now replace some vars in the response (also an excerpt)
		var response = new StringBuilder(ResponseMessages.CoverApplicationResponse);

		return new ResponseMessage { BodyData = new WireMock.Util.BodyData { BodyAsString = response.ToString() } };
	}
}

Leads to:

"Response": {
"StatusCode": 200,
"Headers": {},
"BodyDestination": null,
"Body": null,
"BodyAsJson": null,
"BodyAsBytes": null,
"BodyAsFile": null,
"BodyAsFileIsCached": null,
"BodyOriginal": null,
"BodyEncoding": null,
"DetectedBodyType": 0,
"DetectedBodyTypeFromContentType": 0
},

Am I doing something wrong?

Regards,

Michel

Originally created by @Mies75 on GitHub (Oct 15, 2019). When I use `.WithBody(@"<soapenv:Envelope ` etc. I get a response that is can be handled well by our applications. However when we use a callback, the response message is empty : ``` c# .WithCallback(req => { return CoverApplicationResponseBuilder.CreateResponse(req); }) ``` ``` c# public class CoverApplicationResponseBuilder { public static ResponseMessage CreateResponse(RequestMessage requestSoapMessage) { //get some vars from the requestSoapMessage (excerpt) XDocument doc = XDocument.Parse(requestSoapMessage.Body); //now replace some vars in the response (also an excerpt) var response = new StringBuilder(ResponseMessages.CoverApplicationResponse); return new ResponseMessage { BodyData = new WireMock.Util.BodyData { BodyAsString = response.ToString() } }; } } ``` Leads to: ``` js "Response": { "StatusCode": 200, "Headers": {}, "BodyDestination": null, "Body": null, "BodyAsJson": null, "BodyAsBytes": null, "BodyAsFile": null, "BodyAsFileIsCached": null, "BodyOriginal": null, "BodyEncoding": null, "DetectedBodyType": 0, "DetectedBodyTypeFromContentType": 0 }, ``` Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Michel
adam added the question label 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2019):

You need to provide DetectedBodyType = BodyType.String

See
https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/master/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/ResponseBuilders/ResponseWithCallbackTests.cs#L21

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 15, 2019): You need to provide `DetectedBodyType = BodyType.String` See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/master/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/ResponseBuilders/ResponseWithCallbackTests.cs#L21
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Mies75 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019):

Great, that works!
I also had to add:
responseMsg.Headers.Add("Content-Type", new WireMock.Util.WireMockList<string>() { "text/xml; charset=utf-8" } );

It seems that one has to set all message properties in the callback. Would it be possible to still take the headers and status code from .RespondWith instead of arranging it in the callback?

@Mies75 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019): Great, that works! I also had to add: `responseMsg.Headers.Add("Content-Type", new WireMock.Util.WireMockList<string>() { "text/xml; charset=utf-8" } );` It seems that one has to set all message properties in the callback. Would it be possible to still take the headers and status code from `.RespondWith` instead of arranging it in the callback?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019):

If you only want to manipulate the body, then you can use:

WithBody([NotNull] Func<RequestMessage, string> bodyFactory, .....

See example line 193 in 93682c9bbf/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/ResponseBuilders/ResponseWithBodyTests.cs (L189-L193)

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019): If you only want to manipulate the body, then you can use: `WithBody([NotNull] Func<RequestMessage, string> bodyFactory, .....` See example line 193 in https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/blob/93682c9bbffa9a1e18dac6fa06c31d396eafb9bd/test/WireMock.Net.Tests/ResponseBuilders/ResponseWithBodyTests.cs#L189-L193
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Mies75 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019):

Cool, that works. I rather have my transform functions return strings instead of ResponseMessages.
Thanks!

@Mies75 commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019): Cool, that works. I rather have my transform functions return strings instead of `ResponseMessages`. Thanks!
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019):

OK. Good to hear.

Closing...

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2019): OK. Good to hear. Closing...
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label question
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#222
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?