starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-01-11 22:30:41 +01:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Question: Is there a way to provide a corporate proxy configuration? #220

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00 by adam · 10 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Benny1007 on GitHub (Oct 29, 2019).

for all other requests i'd like to just forward onto someother.server.internal but i get hit by my corporate proxy, how do I provide a corporate proxy for all other requests?

stub.Given(
  Request
    .Create()
    .WithPath("/*")
  ).AtPriority(1000)
  .RespondWith(Response.Create().WithProxy("http://someother.server.internal/api"));
Originally created by @Benny1007 on GitHub (Oct 29, 2019). for all other requests i'd like to just forward onto someother.server.internal but i get hit by my corporate proxy, how do I provide a corporate proxy for all other requests? ``` c# stub.Given( Request .Create() .WithPath("/*") ).AtPriority(1000) .RespondWith(Response.Create().WithProxy("http://someother.server.internal/api")); ```
adam added the feature label 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 14:25:34 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 29, 2019):

Good question. This is not yet supported. I think the best place to add this is with:
public IResponseBuilder WithProxy(IProxyAndRecordSettings settings)

So adding a WebProxySettings property to IProxyAndRecordSettings which supports the URL, username and password would be a good start.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 29, 2019): Good question. This is not yet supported. I think the best place to add this is with: `public IResponseBuilder WithProxy(IProxyAndRecordSettings settings)` So adding a WebProxySettings property to IProxyAndRecordSettings which supports the URL, username and password would be a good start.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2019):

Hello @Benny1007,
Can you please try the NuGet version WireMock.Net.1.0.36-ci-12100.nupkg from MyGet ?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 30, 2019): Hello @Benny1007, Can you please try the NuGet version WireMock.Net.1.0.36-ci-12100.nupkg from MyGet ?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Benny1007 commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2019):

Hi, how do I do that from within VisualStudio? I have ticked 'pre-release' but it doesn't show up.

@Benny1007 commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2019): Hi, how do I do that from within VisualStudio? I have ticked 'pre-release' but it doesn't show up.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2019):

You need to add the nuget feed.
See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions

@StefH commented on GitHub (Oct 31, 2019): You need to add the nuget feed. See https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2019):

Can you test this?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 5, 2019): Can you test this?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019):

@Benny1007 Can you please test ?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019): @Benny1007 Can you please test ?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@Benny1007 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019):

Hi, sorry I thought I had responded already. Unfortunately I can't connect to the repository this test package resides in. At work we use a Nexus hosted repository that we don't have administrative control over. Any package that we as developers use has to be pulled through this corporate Nexus from nuget.org or other proxies the administrators see fit to set up.

@Benny1007 commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019): Hi, sorry I thought I had responded already. Unfortunately I can't connect to the repository this test package resides in. At work we use a Nexus hosted repository that we don't have administrative control over. Any package that we as developers use has to be pulled through this corporate Nexus from nuget.org or other proxies the administrators see fit to set up.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019):

OK. I've uploaded that package also to the normal nuget.org, please get this one.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2019): OK. I've uploaded that package also to the normal nuget.org, please get this one.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2019):

@Benny1007 Can you test that package?

@StefH commented on GitHub (Nov 22, 2019): @Benny1007 Can you test that package?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:25:37 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2019):

https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/pull/370

@StefH commented on GitHub (Dec 7, 2019): https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/pull/370
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#220
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?