starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git synced 2026-01-11 22:30:41 +01:00
Code Issues 32 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Assembly does not have strong name #170

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 14:24:17 +01:00 by adam · 6 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:17 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @megha222 on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019).

In a build environment where strong name trust checks are not bypassed for an application, this package cannot be used.
Referenced assembly 'WireMock.Net, Version=1.0.11.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have a strong name.
Can you consider posting a new version with a strong name?

Originally created by @megha222 on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019). In a build environment where strong name trust checks are not bypassed for an application, this package cannot be used. Referenced assembly 'WireMock.Net, Version=1.0.11.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have a strong name. Can you consider posting a new version with a strong name?
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 14:24:17 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019):

I can strong-name these, however this will be done with a visible certificate, so not really secure.

@StefH commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019): I can strong-name these, however this will be done with a visible certificate, so not really secure.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@megha222 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019):

That is ok. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ericlippert/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-part-five-certificate-signing-vs-strong-naming/
Thanks

@megha222 commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2019): That is ok. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ericlippert/2009/09/03/whats-the-difference-part-five-certificate-signing-vs-strong-naming/ Thanks
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@megha222 commented on GitHub (May 8, 2019):

@StefH any plans on doing this?

@megha222 commented on GitHub (May 8, 2019): @StefH any plans on doing this?
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (May 8, 2019):

I can do this, I'll let you know the progress.

@StefH commented on GitHub (May 8, 2019): I can do this, I'll let you know the progress.
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@codeplayer14 commented on GitHub (May 15, 2019):

@StefH Eagerly waiting for this. Would be of great help!

@codeplayer14 commented on GitHub (May 15, 2019): @StefH Eagerly waiting for this. Would be of great help!
adam commented 2025-12-29 14:24:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@StefH commented on GitHub (May 16, 2019):

New NuGet version is uploaded.

@StefH commented on GitHub (May 16, 2019): New NuGet version is uploaded.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
doc
doc
duplicate
feature
feature
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#170
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?