mirror of
https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git
synced 2026-07-31 17:28:49 +02:00
Problem with Request Match WithBody #163
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 14:24:04 +01:00 by adam
·
4 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
1341-mapping-json
stef-aspire-tests-updates
bug/973-TinyMapper
bug/1149-AppendGuidToSavedMappingFile
feature/1150-DockerImageVersion
61
stef-1108
stef-1097
stef-1083-MessageOptions_Type_Conflict
stef-1062-logger
stef-IgnoreOpenApiErrors
stef-928-TypeLoadException-FluentAssertions-net472
nunit
stef-849
stef-847-regex-questionmark
http_verb
WireMockServerContext
webapp
ai
CommandLineArgumentsParser
2.13.0
2.12.0
2.11.0
2.10.0
2.9.0
2.8.0
2.7.0
2.6.0
2.5.0
2.4.0
2.3.0
2.2.0
2.1.0
2.0.0
1.25.0
1.24.0
1.23.0
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.0
1.17.0
1.16.0
1.15.0
1.14.0
1.13.0
1.12.0
1.11.2
1.11.0
1.10.1
1.10.0
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.18
1.8.17
1.8.16
1.8.15
1.8.14
1.8.13
1.8.12
1.8.11
1.8.10
1.8.9
1.8.8
1.8.7
1.8.6
1.8.5
1.8.3
1.8.2
1.8.1
1.8.0
1.7.4
1.7.3
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.12
1.6.11
1.6.10
1.6.9
1.6.8
1.6.7
1.6.6
1.6.5
1.6.4
1.6.3
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.62
1.5.61
1.5.60
1.5.59
1.5.58
1.5.57
1.5.56
1.5.55
1.5.54
1.5.53
1.5.52
1.5.51
1.5.50
1.5.49
1.5.48
1.5.47
1.5.46
1.5.45
1.5.44
1.5.43
1.5.42
1.5.41
1.5.40
1.5.39
1.5.38
1.5.37
1.5.36
1.5.35
1.5.34
1.5.33
1.5.32
1.5.31
1.5.30
1.5.29
1.5.28
1.5.27
1.5.26
1.5.25
1.5.24
1.5.23
1.5.22
1.5.21
1.5.20
1.5.19
1.5.18
1.5.17
1.5.16
1.5.15
1.5.14
1.5.13
1.5.12
1.5.11
1.5.10
1.5.9
1.5.8
1.5.7
1.5.6
1.5.5
1.5.4
1.5.3
1.5.2
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.43
1.4.42
1.4.41
1.4.40
1.4.39
1.4.38
1.4.37
1.4.36
1.4.35
1.4.34
1.4.33
1.4.32
1.4.31
1.4.30
1.4.29
1.4.28
1.4.27
1.4.26
1.4.25
1.4.24
1.4.23
1.4.22
1.4.21
1.4.20
1.4.19
1.4.18
1.4.17
1.4.16
1.4.15
1.4.14
1.4.13
1.4.12
1.4.11
1.4.10
1.4.9
1.4.8
1.4.7
1.4.6
1.4.5
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.10
1.3.9
1.3.8
1.3.6
1.3.5
1.3.4
1.3.3
1.3.2
1.3.1
1.3.0
1.2.18
1.2.17
1.2.16
1.2.15
1.2.14
1.2.13
1.2.12
1.2.11.0
1.2.10
1.2.9.0
1.2.8.0
1.2.7.0
1.2.6.0
1.2.5.0
1.2.4.0
1.2.3.0
1.2.2.0
1.2.1.0
1.2.0.0
1.1.10
1.1.9.0
1.1.8.0
1.1.7.0
1.1.6.0
1.1.5.0
1.1.3.0
1.1.2.0
1.1.1.0
1.1.0.0
1.0.43.0
1.0.42.0
1.0.41.0
1.0.40.0
1.0.39.0
1.0.38.0
1.0.37.0
1.0.36.0
1.0.35.0
1.0.34.0
1.0.33.0
1.0.32.0
1.0.31.0
1.0.29.0
1.0.28.0
1.0.25.0
1.0.24.0
1.0.23.0
1.0.22.0
1.0.21.0
1.0.20.0
1.0.19.0
1.0.18.0
1.0.17.0
1.0.16.0
1.0.15.0
1.0.14.0
1.0.13.0
1.0.12.0
1.0.11.0
1.0.10.0
1.0.9.0
1.0.8.0
1.0.7.0
1.0.6.1
1.0.6
1.0.5
1.0.4.21
1.0.4.20
1.0.4.19
1.0.4.18
1.0.4.17
1.0.4.16
1.0.4.15
1.0.4.14
1.0.4.13
1.0.4.12
1.0.4.11
1.0.4.10
1.0.4.9
1.0.4.8
1.0.4.7
1.0.4.6
1.0.4.5
1.0.4.4
1.0.4.3
1.0.4.2
1.0.4.1
1.0.4.0
1.0.3.20
1.0.3.19
1.0.3.18
1.0.3.17
1.0.3.16
1.0.3.15
1.0.3.14
1.0.3.13
1.0.3.12
1.0.3.11
1.0.3.10
1.0.3.9
1.0.3.8
1.0.3.7
1.0.3.6
1.0.3.5
1.0.3.4
1.0.3.3
1.0.3.2
1.0.3.1
1.0.3.0
1.0.2.13
1.0.2.12
1.0.2.11
1.0.2.10
1.0.2.9
1.0.2.8
1.0.2.7
1.0.2.6
1.0.2.5
1.0.2.4
1.0.2.1
1.0.2.0
1.0.1.5
1.0.1.3
1.0.1.2
1.0.1.1
1.0.0.0
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#163
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @jafin on GitHub (Feb 12, 2019).
Good afternoon,
I am having trouble understanding what I have configured incorrectly to get a Request match using WithBody. Test below gives 404 when using WithBody and WildcardMatcher or Func matcher.
If I remove the WithBody on the Request then a http OK response occurs.
@jafin commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2019):
I was able to get a matcher going for body content if I used:
but still unsure why WildcardMatcher or as inline func
WithBody(b=>b.ToString().Contains("access_token")))
did not work.
If anyone could enlighten me that would be great!
@StefH commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2019):
When using WildcardMatcher, you should use
*as a wildcard character.Like:
@StefH commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2019):
@jafin : does this solve your issue?
@jafin commented on GitHub (Feb 19, 2019):
yes thanks for the reply.