mirror of
https://github.com/wiremock/WireMock.Net.git
synced 2026-08-30 23:47:27 +02:00
Question: WireMock in Azure #136
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 14:23:23 +01:00 by adam
·
4 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
master
1341-mapping-json
stef-aspire-tests-updates
bug/973-TinyMapper
bug/1149-AppendGuidToSavedMappingFile
feature/1150-DockerImageVersion
61
stef-1108
stef-1097
stef-1083-MessageOptions_Type_Conflict
stef-1062-logger
stef-IgnoreOpenApiErrors
stef-928-TypeLoadException-FluentAssertions-net472
nunit
stef-849
stef-847-regex-questionmark
http_verb
WireMockServerContext
webapp
ai
CommandLineArgumentsParser
2.15.0
2.14.0
2.13.0
2.12.0
2.11.0
2.10.0
2.9.0
2.8.0
2.7.0
2.6.0
2.5.0
2.4.0
2.3.0
2.2.0
2.1.0
2.0.0
1.25.0
1.24.0
1.23.0
1.22.0
1.21.0
1.20.0
1.19.0
1.18.0
1.17.0
1.16.0
1.15.0
1.14.0
1.13.0
1.12.0
1.11.2
1.11.0
1.10.1
1.10.0
1.9.1
1.9.0
1.8.18
1.8.17
1.8.16
1.8.15
1.8.14
1.8.13
1.8.12
1.8.11
1.8.10
1.8.9
1.8.8
1.8.7
1.8.6
1.8.5
1.8.3
1.8.2
1.8.1
1.8.0
1.7.4
1.7.3
1.7.2
1.7.1
1.7.0
1.6.12
1.6.11
1.6.10
1.6.9
1.6.8
1.6.7
1.6.6
1.6.5
1.6.4
1.6.3
1.6.2
1.6.1
1.6.0
1.5.62
1.5.61
1.5.60
1.5.59
1.5.58
1.5.57
1.5.56
1.5.55
1.5.54
1.5.53
1.5.52
1.5.51
1.5.50
1.5.49
1.5.48
1.5.47
1.5.46
1.5.45
1.5.44
1.5.43
1.5.42
1.5.41
1.5.40
1.5.39
1.5.38
1.5.37
1.5.36
1.5.35
1.5.34
1.5.33
1.5.32
1.5.31
1.5.30
1.5.29
1.5.28
1.5.27
1.5.26
1.5.25
1.5.24
1.5.23
1.5.22
1.5.21
1.5.20
1.5.19
1.5.18
1.5.17
1.5.16
1.5.15
1.5.14
1.5.13
1.5.12
1.5.11
1.5.10
1.5.9
1.5.8
1.5.7
1.5.6
1.5.5
1.5.4
1.5.3
1.5.2
1.5.1
1.5.0
1.4.43
1.4.42
1.4.41
1.4.40
1.4.39
1.4.38
1.4.37
1.4.36
1.4.35
1.4.34
1.4.33
1.4.32
1.4.31
1.4.30
1.4.29
1.4.28
1.4.27
1.4.26
1.4.25
1.4.24
1.4.23
1.4.22
1.4.21
1.4.20
1.4.19
1.4.18
1.4.17
1.4.16
1.4.15
1.4.14
1.4.13
1.4.12
1.4.11
1.4.10
1.4.9
1.4.8
1.4.7
1.4.6
1.4.5
1.4.4
1.4.3
1.4.2
1.4.1
1.4.0
1.3.10
1.3.9
1.3.8
1.3.6
1.3.5
1.3.4
1.3.3
1.3.2
1.3.1
1.3.0
1.2.18
1.2.17
1.2.16
1.2.15
1.2.14
1.2.13
1.2.12
1.2.11.0
1.2.10
1.2.9.0
1.2.8.0
1.2.7.0
1.2.6.0
1.2.5.0
1.2.4.0
1.2.3.0
1.2.2.0
1.2.1.0
1.2.0.0
1.1.10
1.1.9.0
1.1.8.0
1.1.7.0
1.1.6.0
1.1.5.0
1.1.3.0
1.1.2.0
1.1.1.0
1.1.0.0
1.0.43.0
1.0.42.0
1.0.41.0
1.0.40.0
1.0.39.0
1.0.38.0
1.0.37.0
1.0.36.0
1.0.35.0
1.0.34.0
1.0.33.0
1.0.32.0
1.0.31.0
1.0.29.0
1.0.28.0
1.0.25.0
1.0.24.0
1.0.23.0
1.0.22.0
1.0.21.0
1.0.20.0
1.0.19.0
1.0.18.0
1.0.17.0
1.0.16.0
1.0.15.0
1.0.14.0
1.0.13.0
1.0.12.0
1.0.11.0
1.0.10.0
1.0.9.0
1.0.8.0
1.0.7.0
1.0.6.1
1.0.6
1.0.5
1.0.4.21
1.0.4.20
1.0.4.19
1.0.4.18
1.0.4.17
1.0.4.16
1.0.4.15
1.0.4.14
1.0.4.13
1.0.4.12
1.0.4.11
1.0.4.10
1.0.4.9
1.0.4.8
1.0.4.7
1.0.4.6
1.0.4.5
1.0.4.4
1.0.4.3
1.0.4.2
1.0.4.1
1.0.4.0
1.0.3.20
1.0.3.19
1.0.3.18
1.0.3.17
1.0.3.16
1.0.3.15
1.0.3.14
1.0.3.13
1.0.3.12
1.0.3.11
1.0.3.10
1.0.3.9
1.0.3.8
1.0.3.7
1.0.3.6
1.0.3.5
1.0.3.4
1.0.3.3
1.0.3.2
1.0.3.1
1.0.3.0
1.0.2.13
1.0.2.12
1.0.2.11
1.0.2.10
1.0.2.9
1.0.2.8
1.0.2.7
1.0.2.6
1.0.2.5
1.0.2.4
1.0.2.1
1.0.2.0
1.0.1.5
1.0.1.3
1.0.1.2
1.0.1.1
1.0.0.0
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
adam (Adam Melkus)
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: starred/WireMock.Net-wiremock#136
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @cpneale on GitHub (Aug 29, 2018).
Originally assigned to: @StefH on GitHub.
Hi,
Is it possible to start a standalone WireMock server from a Web App or Web Job in Azure and then hit the WireMock instance on an external uri?
Thanks!
@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2018):
I doubt that this is possible.
However you can run WireMock.Net as a full server as WebApp or in Azure, take a look at:
https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/WireMock-as-a-(Azure)-Web-App
@cpneale commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2018):
Thanks. Appreciate the quick response and advice.
@StefH commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2018):
Let me know if this works for you. If all works fine, you can close this issue.
@cpneale commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2018):
Yes, works fine. Thanks for your help.