Basically the main idea is to ask for review after an update:
It’s a fair trade. We give a little something and ask for a little something.
This could lead to a new great feature to Armchair. Don't you think so?
Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (May 27, 2016).
There is this nice blog post about asking review to user: [Getting from ⭐️⭐️ to ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️](https://m.signalvnoise.com/getting-from-%EF%B8%8F-%EF%B8%8F-to-%EF%B8%8F-%EF%B8%8F-%EF%B8%8F-%EF%B8%8F-%EF%B8%8F-c65cc3bb7cb1#.1d1zlmxs2)
Basically the main idea is to ask for review after an update:
> It’s a fair trade. We give a little something and ask for a little something.
This could lead to a new great feature to _Armchair_. Don't you think so?
We already do that. We ask every new version of the app after the criteria you specify has been met. You can even change the text to whatever you want to reflect the verbiage they use.
@coneybeare commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2016):
We already do that. We ask every new version of the app after the criteria you specify has been met. You can even change the text to whatever you want to reflect the verbiage they use.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (May 27, 2016).
There is this nice blog post about asking review to user: Getting from ⭐️⭐️ to ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Basically the main idea is to ask for review after an update:
This could lead to a new great feature to Armchair. Don't you think so?
@coneybeare commented on GitHub (Jun 2, 2016):
We already do that. We ask every new version of the app after the criteria you specify has been met. You can even change the text to whatever you want to reflect the verbiage they use.
@ghost commented on GitHub (Jun 6, 2016):
Yes, you're right. Thank you for the answer.