mirror of
https://github.com/ysoftdevs/odc-analyzer.git
synced 2026-03-28 12:02:00 +01:00
Added some expand symbols
This commit is contained in:
@@ -197,4 +197,11 @@ h3.library-identification{
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
.dependencies-table .identifiers .explained{
|
.dependencies-table .identifiers .explained{
|
||||||
border-bottom: none;
|
border-bottom: none;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
.expandable:before{
|
||||||
|
font-family: 'Glyphicons Halflings';
|
||||||
|
content: "\e114";
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
.expandable.collapsed:before{
|
||||||
|
content: "\e080";
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@@ -25,13 +25,13 @@
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
</div>
|
</div>
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
<h4 data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-license">License</h4>
|
<h4 class="expandable" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-license">License</h4>
|
||||||
<div id="@depPrefix-license">@dep.dependencies.map(_._1.license).toSet.toSeq.sorted match {
|
<div class="collapse in" id="@depPrefix-license">@dep.dependencies.map(_._1.license).toSet.toSeq.sorted match {
|
||||||
case Seq("") => {<i>unknown</i>}
|
case Seq("") => {<i>unknown</i>}
|
||||||
case Seq(license) => {@license}
|
case Seq(license) => {@license}
|
||||||
case licenses => {It seems to have multiple licenses detected. Maybe it is a good idea to recheck it manually. Detected licenses: @licenses.mkString(", ")}
|
case licenses => {It seems to have multiple licenses detected. Maybe it is a good idea to recheck it manually. Detected licenses: @licenses.mkString(", ")}
|
||||||
}</div>
|
}</div>
|
||||||
<h4 data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-evidence-details">Evidence</h4>
|
<h4 class="expandable collapsed" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-evidence-details">Evidence</h4>
|
||||||
<div id="@depPrefix-evidence-details" class="collapse">
|
<div id="@depPrefix-evidence-details" class="collapse">
|
||||||
<p>Dependency Check uses so-called <i>evidence</i> for matching of identifiers. When results don't match your expectations, you might find the reason here.</p>
|
<p>Dependency Check uses so-called <i>evidence</i> for matching of identifiers. When results don't match your expectations, you might find the reason here.</p>
|
||||||
<table class="table table-bordered table-condensed">
|
<table class="table table-bordered table-condensed">
|
||||||
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
</table>
|
</table>
|
||||||
</div>
|
</div>
|
||||||
<h4 data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-projects-details">Affected projects (@dep.projects.size)</h4>
|
<h4 class="expandable" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-projects-details">Affected projects (@dep.projects.size)</h4>
|
||||||
<ul id="@depPrefix-projects-details" class="collapse in">@for(p <- dep.projects.toIndexedSeq.sorted){<li>@friendlyProjectName(p)</li>}</ul>
|
<ul id="@depPrefix-projects-details" class="collapse in">@for(p <- dep.projects.toIndexedSeq.sorted){<li>@friendlyProjectName(p)</li>}</ul>
|
||||||
<h4 data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details">Vulnerabilities (@dep.vulnerabilities.size)</h4>
|
<h4 class="expandable" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#@depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details">Vulnerabilities (@dep.vulnerabilities.size)</h4>
|
||||||
<ul id="@depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details" class="collapse in">
|
<ul id="@depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details" class="collapse in">
|
||||||
@for(vuln <- dep.vulnerabilities.toSeq.sortBy(_.cvssScore.map(-_)); vulnPrefix = s"$depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details-${vuln.name}"){
|
@for(vuln <- dep.vulnerabilities.toSeq.sortBy(_.cvssScore.map(-_)); vulnPrefix = s"$depPrefix-vulnerabilities-details-${vuln.name}"){
|
||||||
<li>
|
<li>
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user