minor updates

Former-commit-id: a3746443592105c7fb84d707a09c03dd83e378e1
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Long
2013-04-20 13:36:44 -04:00
parent b3f0fb5392
commit d6ba01f5f5
2 changed files with 27 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ public class DependencyBundlingAnalyzer extends AbstractAnalyzer implements Anal
public AnalysisPhase getAnalysisPhase() {
return ANALYSIS_PHASE;
}
/**
* a flag indicating if this analyzer has run. This analyzer only runs once.
*/
@@ -113,13 +112,13 @@ public class DependencyBundlingAnalyzer extends AbstractAnalyzer implements Anal
//for (Dependency dependencyToCheck : engine.getDependencies()) {
while (mainIterator.hasNext()) {
final Dependency dependency = mainIterator.next();
System.out.println("START " + dependency.getFileName() + "----------------------");
if (mainIterator.hasNext()) {
ListIterator<Dependency> subIterator = engine.getDependencies().listIterator(mainIterator.nextIndex());
while (subIterator.hasNext()) {
final Dependency dependencyToCheck = subIterator.next();
if (identifiersMatch(dependency, dependencyToCheck)
&& hasSameBasePath(dependency, dependencyToCheck)) {
&& hasSameBasePath(dependency, dependencyToCheck)) {
if (isCore(dependency, dependencyToCheck)) {
dependency.addRelatedDependency(dependencyToCheck);
@@ -145,7 +144,6 @@ public class DependencyBundlingAnalyzer extends AbstractAnalyzer implements Anal
}
}
}
System.out.println("END " + dependency.getFileName() + "----------------------");
}
//removing dependencies here as ensuring correctness and avoiding ConcurrentUpdateExceptions
// was difficult because of the inner iterator.
@@ -162,13 +160,10 @@ public class DependencyBundlingAnalyzer extends AbstractAnalyzer implements Anal
* @return true if the identifiers in the two supplied dependencies are equal
*/
private boolean identifiersMatch(Dependency dependency1, Dependency dependency2) {
System.out.println("Checking Identifiers: " + dependency1.getFileName() + " and " + dependency2.getFileName());
if (dependency1 == null || dependency1.getIdentifiers() == null
|| dependency2 == null || dependency2.getIdentifiers() == null) {
return false;
}
System.out.println("Result = " + (dependency1.getIdentifiers().size() > 0
&& dependency2.getIdentifiers().equals(dependency1.getIdentifiers())));
return dependency1.getIdentifiers().size() > 0
&& dependency2.getIdentifiers().equals(dependency1.getIdentifiers());
}
@@ -200,30 +195,28 @@ public class DependencyBundlingAnalyzer extends AbstractAnalyzer implements Anal
* This is likely a very broken attempt at determining if the 'left'
* dependency is the 'core' library in comparison to the 'right' library.
*
* TODO - consider spliting on /\._-\s/ and checking if all of one side is fully contained in the other
* With the exception of the word "core". This might work even on groups when we don't have a CVE.
*
* @param left the dependency to test
* @param right the dependency to test against
* @return a boolean indicating whether or not the left dependency should be
* considered the "core" version.
*/
private boolean isCore(Dependency left, Dependency right) {
System.out.println("Checking iscore: " + left.getFileName() + " and " + right.getFileName());
final String leftName = left.getFileName().toLowerCase();
final String rightName = right.getFileName().toLowerCase();
if (rightName.contains("core") && !leftName.contains("core")) {
System.out.println("core False 1");
return false;
} else if (!rightName.contains("core") && leftName.contains("core")) {
System.out.println("core true 1");
return true;
} else {
//TODO should we be splitting the name on [-_(.\d)+] and seeing if the
// parts are contained in the other side?
if (leftName.length() > rightName.length()) {
System.out.println("core false 2");
return false;
}
System.out.println("core true 2");
return true;
}
}